Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Curtis Samuel vs CMC


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

Coming out they were both compared to each other some saying Samuel was a poor mans CMC. Me personally I feel better about Samuel at this point than CMC(fumble withstanding eeew) because to me he passes the eyeball test. He flashes game breaking speed, his hands look solid and he still is learning the playbook. Slowly but surely he is being brought along into the offense.

 

I think it’s only a matter of time before he catches one of those weekly deep balls. CMC on the other hand is breaking down and his role being decreased almost everywhere. I don’t think we have seen a worse first rounder in terms of blocking in recent memory, and I am almost at the point of saying I would rather see Samuel get his carries at RB. CMC need to just start preparing for his future as a Wes Welker/Edelman type and be done with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, csx said:

I haven't been impressed by Samuel at all.  He seems to play timid

Really? Seems he gets 10 yards every time he does the reverse. And as someone above said he does make a man miss and displays decent hands.... haven’t seen him drop any. And on those deep balls I can atleast see the long speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, KendrickPanther said:

CMC is a good football player. Maybe top 10 was to high but he shows 1st round talent. His movement is incredible and many times all he needs is a block or a better pass so he can keep moving.

I still think CMC will be great, just needs a year under his belt, and should add about 10 to 15 pounds of muscle to his frame so he power through defenders more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

Nothing about Samuels hands look “solid”. He’s had 2 or 3 now hit him in the hands and wasn’t able to grab it.

1 in Detroit, 1 against Philly I believe and yesterdays deep ball hit him right in the hand 

 

I believe has caught all the passes he should have caught. You are asking him to make the difficult catches which I would agree he hasn’t. Which is why I said they look solid. When he’s open it’s not like he’s dropping passes... he makes the open catches,slants comebacks he’s been money on those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ludwig51 said:

What If we switch it up put cmc at wr and Samuel in the back field 

This is what I was thinking... worth a try... maybe we had the formula right just switch around the equation... I don’t think CMC is a natural runningback. He was probably groomed from birth on route running and catching the football like his daddy,only to be placed at runningback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...