Bradberry

[NAS]

Kid deserves just as much praise as anyone for the win today.  He pretty much shut down their #1 WR.  I only saw him beat on one play, everything was tremendous coverage and even made some plays in the running game.  

[LinvilleGorge]

He played really well, but Evans definitely smoked him for what should've been an easy TD had Winston not sailed it. 

[NAS]

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He played really well, but Evans definitely smoked him for what should've been an easy TD had Winston not sailed it. 

True, sometimes it's better to be lucky than good.   But good players also get lucky.  Make sense? lol

[Saca312]

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He played really well, but Evans definitely smoked him for what should've been an easy TD had Winston not sailed it. 

Actually, on that play Mike Evans had his hand inside the facemask which pretty much took Bradberry by surprise. He's been consistently great in his assignment.

[The Lobo]

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He played really well, but Evans definitely smoked him for what should've been an easy TD had Winston not sailed it. 

Evans grabbed his face mask and pulled it down delayed him a second. Should have been a penalty and if he hadn’t of done that Bradberry would have stuck with him.

[ColumbusCounty]

Now imagine year 3 Bradberry (probably when the ball skills start to show a little more) ...and year 3 Worley who "should" equal Rookie Bradberry... if we are lucky. 

I think this defense is set as long as Luke is healthy.  Only real hole next year would be starting SS & Lb depth. Maybe NT depending on Star. On the flipside, pretty sure if the D keeps playing like they have Wilks wont be here too long.  

Back to the topic though, Bradberry is silently overachieving...sadly, without the INT's his media recognition will remain low. 

[Khyber53]

He did well, which is kind of his thing, he plays well. He keeps getting better, too.

Worley did well, too, and Coleman really was in there on a lot of tackles today. Munnerlyn was looking a bit questionable for a while, but then he popped Winston's hand at just the right moment.

 

[TheSpecialJuan]

ya

[SOJA]

Bradberry is an absolute stud and to think Gettleman got destroyed for drafting this kid. 

[TheRumGone]

He’s low key good like gamble

[LinvilleGorge]

14 minutes ago, ColumbusCounty said:

Now imagine year 3 Bradberry (probably when the ball skills start to show a little more) ...and year 3 Worley who "should" equal Rookie Bradberry... if we are lucky. 

I think this defense is set as long as Luke is healthy.  Only real hole next year would be starting SS & Lb depth. Maybe NT depending on Star. On the flipside, pretty sure if the D keeps playing like they have Wilks wont be here too long.  

Back to the topic though, Bradberry is silently overachieving...sadly, without the INT's his media recognition will remain low. 

Not sure Bradberry will ever be a big INT guy but if he continues to be an elite cover guy that's still just fine. 

[uncfan888]

7 minutes ago, SOJA said:

Bradberry is an absolute stud and to think Gettleman got destroyed for drafting this kid. 

Now, you know I love Gettleman.. But he was destroyed for constantly saying BPA instead of need and then drafting three corners

[JawnyBlaze]

11 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

He’s low key good like gamble

Yea the same comparison occurred to me. Reminds me a lot of Gamble. Not flashy but trustworthy to limit top tier WRs to minimal production. 

[CPantherKing]

If not liking to get in on tackles, not averaging at least 1 PD per start, not forcing fumbles, and not getting interceptions makes for a great CB, then there are quite a few of them in the NFL.

Now, I do believe Bradberry may rank a top the NFL in luckiest breaks per game. Let's just hope he does not lose that luck, because that is all he has going for him right now.