Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Ron Rivera a good head coach?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Rivera seems like a nice enough guy...and I am sure the players like him.  But he just is not head coaching material.  He is a poor talent evaluate.  He puts the wrong people in the wrong place.  He is afraid to cut ties and make important decisions.  He is a bad game manager.  He lacks a win-now mentality.  He has no ability to make in-game adjustments.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Simply stated, Ron Rivera is not a leader of men and is best suited as a DC/position coach. But Jerry picks people he likes and/or are comfortable with, not necessarily the right people for the job, thus Ron, Hurney, etc. The one time he stepped out of his comfort zone and sought the advice from an outsider (Accorsi) he got "burned" by hiring Gettleman and it will validate his nature of staying safe with the buddy system. If you think about it, Ron's loyalty to Shula is just an extension of team culture. We can expect more of the same unless the change happens at the top...sigh.

I've not been one to bang the drum for new ownership, but if we ever win under JR it'll be by accident. SB50 was our shot and I knew that watching the game on 2/7/16.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Apparently you can't make polls anymore, so reply to this thread with your answer and I'll tally after 24 hours.

A. I thought you were a titans fan

B. Is Ron Rivera a good coach? Hahahhahaahhahahahahahahhahahahhahaahahhaha are you kidding me with that question?

No he is not and I was saying that since year 2 of his tenure, including the 15-1 run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

No. 

He might be one of the better defensive coordinators in the game, but he doesn't have the skill set to be a good head coach.

I hate it because he seems like an incredibly nice guy with a fine family. If there were a way to keep him as a DC, I'd be all for it, but that kind of thing really just doesn't happen. 

He's worse than Fox was imo. You almost need a great OC to overcome all his poor clock management. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Panthers Fanatic said:

No. Simply stated, Ron Rivera is not a leader of men and is best suited as a DC/position coach. But Jerry picks people he likes and/or are comfortable with, not necessarily the right people for the job, thus Ron, Hurney, etc. The one time he stepped out of his comfort zone and sought the advice from an outsider (Accorsi) he got "burned" by hiring Gettleman and it will validate his nature of staying safe with the buddy system. If you think about it, Ron's loyalty to Shula is just an extension of team culture. We can expect more of the same unless the change happens at the top...sigh.

I've not been one to bang the drum for new ownership, but if we ever win under JR it'll be by accident. SB50 was our shot and I knew that watching the game on 2/7/16.

He didn't get burned by hiring D.G. He was one of the better GM's they have had. Sure he made some mistakes, but also did some very good things. Now bringing Hurney back is a real ass burning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i had started writing a much longer post about how, just from a leadership perspective, he's horrible but i'm just not in the mood.

basically it comes down to this...i think he has good intentions, but he either doesn't have the guts or the ability to take it to the next level, at least not consistently. when it comes right down to it, he's got tunnel vision and is too caught up in the status quo (what he calls consistency).

in his initial press conference that mr. scot eluded to, we saw what he was advertising as a coaching philosophy that was very aggressive for being a defensive minded coach. i was never in favor of hiring another DC to be HC because they have a proven tendency to be more conservative in the game planning and management. i needed to see aggression and coming from the jim johnson school of defense, i thought he might just be able to pull it off. we've seen that a couple times (earning the name riverboat ron), but not consistently. there has always been a regression to his more passive and conservative game management skills that, quite honestly, never showed a significant improvement like we had hoped.

there's a lot of things i value in leadership that i won't go into, but there are some things that are absolute killers that i think rivera has exhibited in spades that negate any positive things he brings to the table.

  • lack of follow through on vision (well intentioned, but unable or unwilling to follow through on what he sets out to do in the beginning of each season)
  • too accepting of poor performances from his staff (mainly on the offensive side of the ball. shula has had one year of a successful offense in all the years (10?) he's had control of the show. he's got a 10% track record of success. at some point you've got to see that maybe it's not just the personnel...it's the one making the decisions. also matsko as running game coordinator? he's got the worst OL and the worst run game we've probably ever had right now. he should pull the plug on that, but who here thinks he will?
  • inability to take the blame and a lack of accountability...that's a real killer. he and shula habitually publicly deflect all of it onto the players. you just can't do that. kills morale. kills confidence. kills the team.

i could go on and on....but essentially he's just not a good leader. i don't think he has the team's back. i think he's got his assistant coaches back and that's about it. he needs to go because at this point and going forward he's going to do more harm than good.

i felt early on that he should have game management responsibilities taken away from him until he gets a better grasp on it, but thought that he did a pretty good job of preparing the team for action. i think the team is less prepared this year than at any time in his tenure here and worse, he never got better at game management.

he's a likable fellow, but he should go back to being a DC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jmac said:

He didn't get burned by hiring D.G. He was one of the better GM's they have had. Sure he made some mistakes, but also did some very good things. Now bringing Hurney back is a real ass burning.

Agreed. I'm just coming at it from the owner's perspective with that comment. JR's probably sitting at home thinking he'll never do that again and will stick to his method of hiring people he likes. I think Gettleman had his faults but he was the first true GM this franchise ever had and was willing to make some tough decisions, despite his lack of tact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since  everyone has basically said RR is not a good head coach,  my question is how many NFL head coaches are actually really good at what they do?

Other than Belichick, Tomlinson, Mike McCarthy, and Pete Carroll how many really good NFL Head Coaches are there? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...