Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Meeks/Fox Defensive Co.


dmo4455

Recommended Posts

i thought the d went south when fox took over last year......and who was calling plays the first half of the dallas game bc i want that defense.

see i think fox stepped in at halftime. not really, they just played with so much intensity and aggression, but wore down in the second half when our offense did nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sooner or later Fox will take control of this defense like he always does, and when he does it will start playing better. I always thought that Fox should just be the defensive coordinator instead of always having to step in when things go bad. Just my 2cents.

Fox got involved last year during the second half of the season. The D was better during the 1st half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the defense went down hill in the 2nd half of last season. I'm sure that playing better opponents and having Kemo, Lewis, and Beason either out for some games or playing hurt had nothing to do with it. Who needs to be strong in the middle to shut NFL offenses down anyway? Good coaches can make the defense good no matter what. That's why Tennessee is not missing Haynesworth at all this year...oh wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the defense went down hill in the 2nd half of last season. I'm sure that playing better opponents and having Kemo, Lewis, and Beason either out for some games or playing hurt had nothing to do with it. Who needs to be strong in the middle to shut NFL offenses down anyway? Good coaches can make the defense good no matter what. That's why Tennessee is not missing Haynesworth at all this year...oh wait.

Really thats the nail on the head right there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sooner or later Fox will take control of this defense like he always does, and when he does it will start playing better. I always thought that Fox should just be the defensive coordinator instead of always having to step in when things go bad. Just my 2cents.

If you don't mind my asking, how tough is it to watch these guys getting run over like they have been?

We've had loads of speculation on here about Fox's role. Interesting to get some actual insight into it. Validates what a lot of us have thought previously.

Biggest question I'd have would be why it's so difficult for Fox to find someone he trusts completely enough to remain hands off. Does 'that guy' not exist or is he just unavailable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the defense went down hill in the 2nd half of last season. I'm sure that playing better opponents and having Kemo, Lewis, and Beason either out for some games or playing hurt had nothing to do with it. Who needs to be strong in the middle to shut NFL offenses down anyway? Good coaches can make the defense good no matter what. That's why Tennessee is not missing Haynesworth at all this year...oh wait.

injury wasn't a reason for the 2nd half collapse on defense. Outside of the NYG game there is no argument to be made there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

injury wasn't a reason for the 2nd half collapse on defense. Outside of the NYG game there is no argument to be made there.

That's BS. Even after that Giants game, all three of those guys were playing hurt. Hell, Beason and Lewis were both playing with basically one good arm and Nick Hayden was still playing a lot of snaps. They still played well against Denver the week after the Giants game anyway, and the only other regular season games that they gave up a lot of points in, were the Green Bay and Saints games, which were both on the road.

I keep hearing that it started right after the bye, but that's BS too. They played Oakland right after the bye and the defense and DeAngelo Williams pretty much won that game despite a sorry day by the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'll all have to forgive me, but if a former star defensive player thinks that the defense works better under Fox than it does under someone else, then I'll believe it.

Dan Morgan was a helluva a player, better than beason is..most of us know that and i'm glad to see him actually communicate with some of the fans who cheered him on and pulled for him in his years with the panthers. With that being said i dont care what he says about fox, until i see proof on the field i will remain skeptical of him and when he goes i wont miss him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is true then it suggests that Fox was the one running the defense the first half of last year. Then during the bye that's when we started hearing about Fox and Turdo getting together and adjusting the playbook. Then after the bye, Fox let's Turdo take control, but he fails miserably. This year Fox took a different approach and let Meeks run the defense first this year, but he's failing as well. If all of that is true, Fox is a better DC than a Head Coach.

I don't want Fox as the Head Coach, but it would be nice if he could step down and accept the DC role while we get a new head coach after this year assuming all of the above is true of course. However, I dont know of many instances of Head Coaches stepping down and accepting a Coordinator job with the same team =\

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't know about you but I have been a life long Chiefs fan for the past 4 years.
    • Sure there's a ton of transplants in Colorado now. But as far as Denver in particular goes the Broncos have also been around for 65 years. Someone moving to Denver is going to be far more likely to become a fan of the Broncos and even attend games versus someone moving to Charlotte and the Panthers. Like I said it's not just one single thing with us it's multiple factors.
    • He's definitely getting better. It's fun to watch.  I've been getting killed for this take, but with the current state of college football, it just takes more time to develop a quarterback. I don't think it's a plug and play position anymore. I'm really not sure if it ever was. NFL offenses have always been substantially more complex than the college game, and the college game has simplified even more in recent years. Many college teams do not have a physical playbook anymore. That's just not the national football league.  Are there freaks who have success from day 1? Yes, without question. But so many of those guys are runners, and so many of those guys tail off. Is Bryce ever going to be Josh Allen? Probably not.  What I am seeing is a guy with complete command of the offense. He's checking into things at the line, making adjustments, and making timely throws.  He goes to David Moore a ton, because Moore is a consistent route runner. Bryce knows where he is and when he should be open. I think the guy with the "super processor" needs to be comfortable in the offense in order to do the "super processing." He doesn't have elite arm talent, and he is small of stature, but if he makes the smart play consistently, and he's willing to throw the ball downfield and not make mistakes, like he's starting to show, he's going to be a starter for a long time in this league, and it's not a position I'd spend draft capital right now. 
×
×
  • Create New...