Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What's the deal with Shaq continually being asked to cover slot receivers?


KSpan

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, UDcc123 said:

I feel bad for Shaq.  They keep saying they want him to be the next TD...but tell me the last time you saw TD dropping back in man coverage against WRs or fast TEs.  We drafted him to be a playmaker the same way TD is, and when they use him that way he performs like a 1st round draft pick.  When they use him as a CB, of course he'll get burned. 

Others LBs around the league have covered WRs & TE successfully , Shaq has to get better as a player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All game, lot's of plays, before the snap I would see Shaq lineup against #13 in the slot and would point it out to my son and say we are eventually going to get burned with that which is exactely what happened on their touchdown in the 3rd Qtr.  

I get it and saw a bunch of times Shaq would blitz from that formation or maybe they wanted him in for stopping the run?? But if I saw the mismatch all game, you bet their coaches did as well and AGAIN took advantage of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Rewatch the games, after the raiders game they took out Klein every time we went into the nickel. So it was Shaq and TD on the field 

Klein was still the starting MLB in our base 4-3 scheme that entire time.  Shaq doesn’t fit that and I don’t think anything suggests that type move. 

He fits nickel looks.  Got no problems with him and TD in nickel.  Supported that last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Klein was still the starting MLB in our base 4-3 scheme that entire time.  Shaq doesn’t fit that and I don’t think anything suggests that type move. 

He fits nickel looks.  Got no problems with him and TD in nickel.  Supported that last year. 

The issue is that they are letting Shaq play 2 soft in coverage. If they got him covering they need to let play press or allow him to get physical at LoS and jam the rewind Rivera disrupt the timing of the route.

 

We have to use his physicality to our advantage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean.....his guy has to be someone willing to come so Geno Smith is out. If you mean RUSSELL Wilson, that is laughable. Fields and ZACH Wilson are just basically the beginning of the end. These aren't likely to be Geno Smith turnarounds. Fields is further proving that he just isn't much more than a gimmick player. Zach Wilson still probably needs a year or two under some better circumstances before I would consider him a candidate for being a turnaround. He is just jumping straight back into the NY Jets fire here. 
    • This is factually incorrect. He was a two time Pro Bowler with the Rams and in fact statistically he was better with the Rams in his best season there than he has been with the Lions(could change with this season). Some of his per game stats have creeped into being marginally better with the Lions but there have not been dramatic differences in his play, actually. The biggest reason that McVay and he ended up splitting was McVay didn't think he could win a title with Goff. TBH.....so far he was 100% correct. Stafford almost immediately won them a SB and Goff in a historic run was about 70% of the reason the Lions faltered in the NFC championship game. He missed critical throws all over the first half and throughout the second half that he normally wouldn't. He choked. So, until Goff actually does win a SB...McVay has been right.
    • they have the best defense they've had in a long time...probably the best in the reid/mahommes era.  but i think they are probably the most beatable they've been in a while as well. record doesn't exactly bear that out, but they just don't look as strong on offense as they usually do. lots of reasons for that, like trying to build chemistry with newer receivers, but right now they just aren't as frightening as they typically are. i mean they'll probably win tomorrow, but i don't see them as the strongest team in the AFC right now. 
×
×
  • Create New...