Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

-7


ncfan

Recommended Posts

They say you cant win games when your losibg the turnover gams.

We're -7 in turnover ratio this year. Polar opposite of 2015. 

How we're 4-2 looking at that shocks the heck out of me

0 ints by the DBs this year.  Whens the last time our DBs had 0 ints to start the first 6 games.......combined?

For Fug sakes......Tre Boston has More ints than all of our DBs combined this year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The D isn't getting turnovers and damn if we aren't just being flat out unlucky on some of this stuff. Their muffed punt absolutely should've been a turnover. That pass that bounced off Stew's chest absolutely should not have been a turnover. 

I honestly wasn't all that worried about our lack of INTs, but the issue is that we're not even coming close to getting INTs. Usually when you're struggling to create turnovers you're having some near misses. That isn't the case. We honestly haven't even had all that many chances at an INT this season. I can't remember a single one that we should've or honestly even could've come down with tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The D isn't getting turnovers and damn if we aren't just being flat out unlucky on some of this stuff. Their muffed punt absolutely should've been a turnover. That pass that bounced off Stew's chest absolutely should not have been a turnover. 

I honestly wasn't all that worried about our lack of INTs, but the issue is that we're not even coming close to getting INTs. Usually when you're struggling to create turnovers you're having some near misses. That isn't the case. We honestly haven't even had all that many chances at an INT this season. I can't remember a single one that we should've or honestly even could've come down with tonight.

The other teams receivers usually have about 5 yards of separation from our DBs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ncfan said:

They say you cant win games when your losibg the turnover gams.

We're -7 in turnover ratio this year. Polar opposite of 2015. 

How we're 4-2 looking at that shocks the heck out of me

0 ints by the DBs this year.  Whens the last time our DBs had 0 ints to start the first 6 games.......combined?

For Fug sakes......Tre Boston has More ints than all of our DBs combined this year

This is a great point.  Only the Bears are worse and good teams just dont have a stat like that.  Just dont.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

The other teams receivers usually have about 5 yards of separation from our DBs

Exactly. My Eagles fan buddy was bitching and moaning about the pass interference calls on them and how we weren't getting any but just had to chuckle when I pointed out that we were rarely close enough to a receiver to even be considered to be covering them, much less interfering with them. Evidently the Eagles' CBs are weak yet our receivers were consistently blanketed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

that number has to turn around eventually, right? 

You'd think so, but we're going to have to get some DBs close enough to receivers to make a play on the ball first. Still, with the pressure we're putting on QBs you'd think we would've had one or two like Cam's first one tonight. Nothing to do with coverage, just a QB hit while throwing and a ball up in the air for grabs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry @ncfan I made the exact same thread at exactly the same time (hopefully a mod will delete mine). I think this is really important. If you consider how good our Dline has been, its quite amazing how we have generated so few turnovers. And meanwhile as brilliant as Cam was the last two games hes throwing a lot of balls into situations where defenders are favorite. It's nothing short of astonishing that at -7 we are 4-2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SeoulPanther said:

Sorry @ncfan I made the exact same thread at exactly the same time (hopefully a mod will delete mine). I think this is really important. If you consider how good our Dline has been, its quite amazing how we have generated so few turnovers. And meanwhile as brilliant as Cam was the last two games hes throwing a lot of balls into situations where defenders are favorite. It's nothing short of astonishing that at -7 we are 4-2. 

Exactly, and if you told me we could be 4-2 when the schedule came out I'd have taken it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You'd think so, but we're going to have to get some DBs close enough to receivers to make a play on the ball first. Still, with the pressure we're putting on QBs you'd think we would've had one or two like Cam's first one tonight. Nothing to do with coverage, just a QB hit while throwing and a ball up in the air for grabs.

exactly, or a RB tipping it up to the defender.

that's why I truly believe those breaks will eventually fall in our favor. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...