Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers rank 6th in ESPN week 6 power rankings

MVPccaffrey

By MVPccaffrey,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

jfra78 Veteran

jfra78

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, TheMaulClaw said:

How in the hell are the Pats rated higher then we are?  We just beat them in their house.

they are the pats until they are mathematically eliminated most "experts" will think they are going to be champs

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, electro's horse said:

early bye, two embarrassingly close wins against the bears and lions.

yeah, i was thinking that sounded about right. they just don't look as good as the carry-over hype they've been getting from last year.

early bye probably isn't going to do them any favors as the season goes on, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
electro's horse Grand Master

electro's horse

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, rayzor said:

yeah, i was thinking that sounded about right. they just don't look as good as the carry-over hype they've been getting from last year.

early bye probably isn't going to do them any favors as the season goes on, either.

i mean they weren't going to be the third or fourth best offense in nfl history again

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

washington post...

1. Kansas City Chiefs (5-0) | Last Week’s Rank: 1

2. Green Bay Packers (4-1) | Last Week’s Rank: 2

3. Philadelphia Eagles (4-1) | Last Week’s Rank: 5

4. Denver Broncos (3-1) | Last Week’s Rank: 4

5. Carolina Panthers (4-1) | Last Week’s Rank: 8

6. New England Patriots (3-2) | Last Week’s Rank: 9

7. Seattle Seahawks (3-2) | Last Week’s Rank: 13

8. Atlanta Falcons (3-1) | Last Week’s Rank: 11

9. Detroit Lions (3-2) | Last Week’s Rank: 6

10. Los Angeles Rams (3-2) | Last Week’s Rank: 7

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ball4life Contributor

Ball4life

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

early bye, two embarrassingly close wins against the bears and lions.

Reading this board you would have thought the Falcons lost to the Lions/Bears. Falcons controlled both of those games. 

Falcons didn't start blowing teams out until end of the year last year. Offense still looks dominant when healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
electro's horse Grand Master

electro's horse

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Ball4life said:

Reading this board you would have thought the Falcons lost to the Lions/Bears. Falcons controlled both of those games. 

Falcons didn't start blowing teams out until end of the year last year. Offense still looks dominant when healthy. 

Falcons didn't control poo against the bears what are you talking about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Chiefs vs Panthers

      By strato · Posted

      For the silly people that worship her it will be that.  The Coleman 'legend' thing, they did that with another fairly average player that was here and I sort of mocked or questioned the 'legend' status. Instantly caught crap for insulting someone's favorite Panther. So okay, Kurt Coleman is a Legend. 
    • MHS831
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You allow him to compete--you all are talking as if I am proposing making him the starter. Give him a new coach, new weapons, good OL, etc. and see what happens. You are saying, "Well Damn.  It did not work for 3 guys..."  Right now, our C is injured, we lost our top 2 WRs.  Better question:  If you need a QB, Why would you not take a chance on bringing in a QB who was a former first rounder, a good arm, intelligence, mobility, youth, etc.  and see how he does out of NY--with a better OL, better running game, better receivers.  I am not saying give him a 10-year contract, I am saying give him a chance. You act like there is no improvement on offense here--it was a 2 year process, and next year is year 2.  To me, how can you sit there with Bryce and an opportunity to sign a veteran QB on the cheap comes available and you say--"Not us. We're good.  We are waiting for Patrick Mahommes."  Jone's problem is obviously mental--and he has little support.  Why is this so frigging hard to comprehend.  It is called "bottom fishing" and it is better than sitting in the boat.  
    • TheSpecialJuan
      Predictions for Brooks debut

      By TheSpecialJuan · Posted

      I think we're going to fall from behind quite early and be forced to abandon the run game.  3 rushes -2 yards 1 catch -10 yards 
×
×
  • Create New...