Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetical convo with Rivera


Recommended Posts

something tells me Leeroy is gonna have him a sit down with Paddle Boat Ron here in the near future.

in the spirit of the OP, i just have two questions for him. judge for yourself how you should approach them with the HC:

1) why the stubborn refusal to ditch Mike Shula in the face of insurmountable evidence that 2015 was a fluke year for his offensive scheme? and,

2) why do your balls seem to shrivel up whenever the Panthers get a 2 touchdown lead? yesterday was sort of an exception, but the pattern is still there. why do we not keep our foot on the gas? maybe play smarter, but just as hard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I could presume to tell him is that a lot of fans seem to really like it when he's the riverboat gambler, and will probably excuse the occasional missed first down.  But seriously, this guy has been in the game as a coach and player for his entire adult life.  Does anyone on this board seriously think they can tell him anything about the game, or his staff, or his team that he doesn't already know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hypothetically, I would assume you would not want to be a douche canoe and would speak in a respectable manner, because that's what normal humans do face to face and not through the anonymity of the internet.

So if that is that case I would ask the following in a respectful manner:

  • His thoughts on the Gettleman firing. What was his working relationship like and does he think it was justified?
  • Why does the offense not implement a more uptempo style more often? Not even no huddle, just allowing Cam to get to the line and possibly audible, make some reads, etc? It worked in NE and it worked in all of 2015, but last year and the first 3 weeks of this year there was no pep in the offense's step. Is it the personnel unfamiliar with the plays? Is there an issue getting plays into the huddle? What gives?
  • If Wilks' defense continues to show out and do well and he receives a HC offer, who would be next in line to take over DC duties? Eric Washington?
  • Is there a player you guys passed in the draft that you really wanted but we didn't pull the trigger on?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I certainly would not question how he does his job or tell him how to do his job. I would enjoy just a normal conversation with about anything that comes up. Not necessarily football. He is a really good man and has an interesting history. It would be cool to listen to some cool stories from him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...