Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone Concered about the D?

Shonuff

By Shonuff,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, outlaw4 said:

Frankly, I don't care if it was Drew Brees. The D's performance today was unacceptable. A team that wants to claim they're the best defensive unit we've ever had doesn't allow anyone to score 30+ points at home.

Granted, the defense did not play well.  But with three picks, some of those points are on the offense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    Huh? No. I have no idea. (Although, by some of your posts....lol)

My point was that your post was irrelevant being that we lost. 

It's not that we lost. Hell, upsets happen. It's that we got thoroughly dominated at home by a previously winless team that was almost universally picked to finish last in the division. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

My point was that your post was irrelevant being that we lost. 

It's not that we lost. Hell, upsets happen. It's that we got thoroughly dominated at home by a previously winless team that was almost universally picked to finish last in the division. 

 

    Oh, I get it. My cliche is irrelevant. But your cliche is permissable? Cool. Nice to know the rules.

 

    We beat two teams we should have beaten. Then we lost a Division game. Which I would not call those automatic wins. My cliche stands. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Granted, the defense did not play well.  But with three picks, some of those points are on the offense.  

 

    It was like, because we settled for a FG on that first drive. Everything just kinda snowballed downhill the rest of the way. Just a perfect storm. It happens. But man, is it frustrating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
Just now, Davidson Deac II said:

I agree.  I am hoping it was just one of those days that teams and indeed everyone sometimes has.

 

    You see it all the time. Something negative happens, And the next thing you know, you are in jail waiting for a bail bondsman. 

 

    Something to think about. This is the type of game Coaches can get on the players over. Question them, and see how they respond. Or at least that is my saving grace for this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    Oh, I get it. My cliche is irrelevant. But your cliche is permissable? Cool. Nice to know the rules.

 

    We beat two teams we should have beaten. Then we lost a Division game. Which I would not call those automatic wins. My cliche stands. 

Hell, anything stands if SD add in enough qualifiers. My point was that we've faced nothing but bad teams so it's still tough to determine how we really match up against quality opponents 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Shonuff said:

lol, you are right and why I wasn't worrying about winning this one.  Everyone is having a fit over rusty Cam.  Not worried one bit, he just finished preseason...seems he and CMC are getting it together...if that dude doesn't get hurt, that offense is going to be potent in a few weeks. Shula actually had some creativity, I like what they are starting to do.

At this point Cam doesn't look rusty he looks broke

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Hell, anything stands if SD add in enough qualifiers. My point was that we've faced nothing but bad teams so it's still tough to determine how we really match up against quality opponents 

 

    Then why didn't you just say that. Instead of using a tired cliche about who we beat won't have a winning record. We knew they weren't the best teams. Yet we beat them. So me saying good teams beat teams they should. Is true as well.

 

    Just face it. You used a cliche to throw shade on our 2-1 record. Which, if my math is correct, is considered a winning record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...