Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So About Worley Giving Up "Cushion" On That Last Drive Against Holmes


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Are we sure he didn't know the play? Not to make excuses but he could be heated about being told to play 10 yards off the ball on 3rd and 1.

Regardless, we went into classic Rivera prevent defense and allowed them to march down the field despite the Bills inability to get anything going in the passing game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Well they had to be using hand signals so he either missed them or couldn't see them. I still think if ten out of eleven guys get the signal, then it's your fault you didn't get it. And like @*FreeFua* said, know the situation and man up like the

 

    Dang man. We are 2-0, our Defense is #1, and Worley is having himself a fine start to the year. IMO, critiquing one play like this is just plain petty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

    Dang man. We are 2-0, our Defense is #1, and Worley is having himself a fine start to the year. IMO, critiquing one play like this is just plain petty. 

I'm not saying bench the guy haha. I'm saying being heated like that when the game is on the line is unnecessary 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, pantherphan96 said:

Are we sure he didn't know the play? Not to make excuses but he could be heated about being told to play 10 yards off the ball on 3rd and 1.

Regardless, we went into classic Rivera prevent defense and allowed them to march down the field despite the Bills inability to get anything going in the passing game.

 

    That is a good point. However, it does not fit the narrative. 

 

    We applied a bunch of pressure on that last drive. It took them 3:30 to go 60 yards, they were grinding it out. We were still mixing up our plays, and still bliltzed quite often.

 

    IMO, we played a much more aggressive D than we have in the past. Unfortunately, even that almost didn't work. Sometimes the other team is just successful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, pantherphan96 said:

Are we sure he didn't know the play? Not to make excuses but he could be heated about being told to play 10 yards off the ball on 3rd and 1.

Regardless, we went into classic Rivera prevent defense and allowed them to march down the field despite the Bills inability to get anything going in the passing game.

I don't think they'd play one corner ten yards off and the other one manned up on the line. But yeah, have to love Rivera and his prevent defense. The only objective of prevent defense is to not let someone get behind you.. And zay Jones got behind everyone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, pantherphan96 said:

Are we sure he didn't know the play? Not to make excuses but he could be heated about being told to play 10 yards off the ball on 3rd and 1.

Regardless, we went into classic Rivera prevent defense and allowed them to march down the field despite the Bills inability to get anything going in the passing game.

I just watched Wilks presser and he did mention how they ask Worley to play a bit more off (I'm thinking this is due to him not being as quick/fluid) but had him come up more near the end. This play was about as close to "near the end" as possible so who knows. 

I think it was Jourdan that had mentioned that during Tyrod's production meeting he mentioned that they know Worley likes to give more of a cushion and that he'd look to exploit that, which on that last drive he was 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

I just watched Wilks presser and he did mention how they ask Worley to play a bit more off (I'm thinking this is due to him not being as quick/fluid) but had him come up more near the end. This play was about as close to "near the end" as possible so who knows. 

I think it was Jourdan that had mentioned that during Tyrod's production meeting he mentioned that they know Worley likes to give more of a cushion and that he'd look to exploit that, which on that last drive he was 

Hmm. So I guess they did have Bradberry manned up and him off. But if they had it designed for him to be that far off on 3rd and 1, then that's idiotic 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, *FreeFua* said:

I just watched Wilks presser and he did mention how they ask Worley to play a bit more off (I'm thinking this is due to him not being as quick/fluid) but had him come up more near the end. This play was about as close to "near the end" as possible so who knows. 

I think it was Jourdan that had mentioned that during Tyrod's production meeting he mentioned that they know Worley likes to give more of a cushion and that he'd look to exploit that, which on that last drive he was 

I think its a good idea to have Worley sag off a little in coverage vs Bradberry just because of Bradberrys ability to press is so well developed at this point, but I hate to see the CB 10 yards off the receiver on a 3rd and 1 play. DL has to generate more pressure on that last drive as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, uncfan888 said:

Hmm. So I guess they did have Bradberry manned up and him off. But if they had it designed for him to be that far off on 3rd and 1, then that's idiotic 

Yeah definitely a miscommunication somewhere. 

Like @pantherphan96 said, it's good to have Worley sag a bit but 8 yards on 3rd and 1 given the situation... no way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Hmm. So I guess they did have Bradberry manned up and him off. But if they had it designed for him to be that far off on 3rd and 1, then that's idiotic 

 

    Something to mull over is the fact that that play was on the far hash. That is a long throw. Playing off can give him time to react. Bradberry was on the short side, and he was pressing his man. The shorter the throw, the closer you have to play to the receiver. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Harmony Flow CBD Gummies || https://supplementcarts.com/harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-official/ Harmony Flow CBD Gummies stand separated as a normal #1 for anyone hoping to work on their success through typical fixes. These gummies are not just typical sweets; they are framed with an exceptional blend of trimmings planned to help an extent of clinical benefits, including additionally created beat rule, better cholesterol levels, and weight the board. For by far most, incorporating such upgrades into their everyday timetable is a drawing in framework to deal with lifestyle related clinical issues. With the climb of CBD things in the standard market, it becomes crucial to look at what compels Harmony Flow CBD Gummies a basic contender. This review will hop significant into their definition, practicality, benefits, assessing plan, and buyer analysis to help anticipated buyers with chasing after an informed decision. Whether you're expecting to work on your overall prosperity or direct express conditions, Harmony Flow CBD Gummies could justify considering as a part of a comprehensive method for managing flourishing.   Facebook Page:- https://www.facebook.com/Harmony.Flow.CBD.Gummies/ https://www.facebook.com/events/1944377819402039/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/1953646655111216 https://www.facebook.com/Online.Supra.Keto.BHB.ACV.Gummies.UK/   More Related Blogs https://zenodo.org/records/14012614 https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies.webflow.io/ https://in.pinterest.com/HarmonyFlowCBDGummies/ https://harmonyflowcbdgummiesofficial.quora.com/ https://in.pinterest.com/pin/1132444268799258229 https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-1.jimdosite.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies.mystrikingly.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies.godaddysites.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies95.mywebselfsite.net/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies.unicornplatform.page/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-official.mystrikingly.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-reviews.mywebselfsite.net https://harmonyflowcbdgummiesofficial.godaddysites.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-official.uncrn.co/ https://harmonyflowcbdgummies.quora.com/ https://harmonyflowcbdgummies.godaddysites.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-3.jimdosite.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbdgummies.mystrikingly.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-ccda58.webflow.io/ https://news.bangboxonline.com/Harmony-Flow-CBD-Gummies https://dedicated-ferret-mgq9gt.mystrikingly.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies.mywebselfsite.net/ https://harmonyflowcbdgummies5.godaddysites.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies.jimdosite.com https://harmonyflowcbdgummies4.godaddysites.com/ https://harmonyflowcbdgummiesreview.quora.com/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies-reviews.uncrn.co/ https://harmony-flow-cbd-gummies77.mywebselfsite.net/
    • I didn't say much bigger. Watch the highlights I linked. Bryce doesn't have the arm strength and/or talent to make the vast majority of the throws Mac made in that video. 
    • Tetairoa McMillan.   The last 28 1st overall picks were either a QB, DE, or OT. Seeing as I don't think we'd take an OT in the 1st and give up on Ickey as an LT yet and there doesn't seem to be a clear overall #1 type of QB or DE pick this year, it very well could be a non conventional #1 overall this year, at least in regards from the last almost 3 decades of drafts. If we didn't have Horn, I'd be more open to Hunter as a CB at #1, but we have him so another CB wouldn't be how I'd use a #1 pick.  And as much as I love Legette, if we have SB contending aspirations, I don't think Legette is a #1 on a team like that, but he damn sure is an elite #2 on a team like that.  He's more of the Smith/Higgins/Waddle to Brown/Chase/Hill (in terms of role/impact, not style of play of course). T-Mac is going to be the top ranked WR on every team's board in the end.  He is going to be a true outside #1 WR who is viewed as a consensus Top 5 WR in the game by his second contract in the same way guys like Jefferson and Chase have done.  His height combined with his speed, athleticism, and hands are near impossible to find all in one player, there is a reason his generally used comp is Mike Evans (although as he's not as thick, I personally see him more as an AJ Green). Yes, as an Arizona alum I've admitted to having bias towards the player to begin with.  But he's also someone very widely being put into the Top 5 in mock drafts lately and most of them have him as the first non QB offensive player being taken, so it's not really THAT much of a homer pick on my part anyways. If a QB or DE truly separate themselves as being a can't miss prospect come draft day, I'm open to that discussion, but until then, or if it doesn't happen, T-Mac is my pick 100 times out of 100.
×
×
  • Create New...