Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Glorified Preseason Games?


UpstatePanther

Recommended Posts

Just thought of a different perspective than I've seen posted thus far. I am by no means a Shula apologist. He is 85% of the reason we performed so poorly yesterday on offense. But what if this is all part of the master plan? The 49ers and Bills are hardly teams worth opening up the playbook for. Maybe I'll have holes shot all through this here hot take, but maybe Shula is reserving more nuanced offensive play calling for a game that matters. Like... New England, Detroit, Philly, Tampa, Atlanta, Minnesota, and Green Bay. Maybe we won't get to see much of the "evolved" offense until we travel to Foxborough in Week 4. Maybe the hope is that by then, Cam will be near 100% and our offense will be getting some rhythm and timing. Maybe the coaching staff is playing close to the best these first 3 weeks to save any element of surprise for stiffer competition.

It's a good tactical move, IMHO. I just hope we don't rest on our laurels this week. Even with our stout defense, i expect The Mole to hang at least 14 on us. Our offense needs to be able to score at least 21 for us to have a hope of winning the game.

 

Anyway... what sayest thou, O Huddle? Is Shula playing close to the vest and giving out vanilla, preseason offense while we dispense with lesser teams to start the year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a sense, it's preseason for Cam and the receivers. Cam actually looked pretty solid for most of yesterday, and only missed a couple throws he would normally make almost certainly due to a lack of practice. On the other hand, I was extremely impressed with Cam's chemistry with Benjamin, Funchess, and McCaffery (that one throw aside). He trusts them and they are responding in turn.

I think we'll be much closer to 100% against New England.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, KendrickPanther said:

Just the general vibe on these boards... I've never seen this fanbase so upset to be 2-0. You would think we lost yesterday.

After drafting offense with our first 2 picks and listening to everyone preach about our offensive evolution only to come out and score 2 tds in 2 games, and looking like dog poo in the process, people have every right to be pissed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The draft isn't a vending machine where you insert a pick, press A3, and out pops a franchise cornerstone. It’s more like a gacha game - you turn in a premium (or non-premium) ticket, hear the fun little jingle, and wait to see what you pulled... without knowing how strong it'll actually end up. League-wide, the average draft hits on about 30 - 40% of its picks when teams have a standard seven selections. So if you walk away with 3 - 4 real contributors... that's considered a solid class. Hitting on 4 out of 11 is right in that range. To be clear: this isn't some veiled endorsement of Tepper, Fitterer, or Rhule. It’s simply an honest accounting of which players from that class are still with the Panthers and heading into their fourth year - and thus outlasting the average NFL career. Just trying to lean more toward more critiquing with clarity, not just lighting it all on fire for the spectacle of the flames.
    • Please do not forget that everything the NFL does is for the increase in revenue. If a big market team draws more money [ticket sales, betting revenue, TV ratings & etc.] when they play at home versus on the road in the playoffs, you can safely be sure the NFL knows & will act accordingly. Just like the draft lottery proposal, if the NFL can capture TV ratings for it, they will.
    • For a WR, 6'4" 220 would be decent size--if you hit the 235 range, I imagine that it costs you speed. I think his speed was an issue. He ran a 4.48 at his pro day. At the combine, he weighed in at 219 (NFL.com).   Mike Evans weighed 225 as a rookie and is also 6'4".  He ran a 4.53 40.  My main and only concern about TMac is between his ears--and it could be nothing.  He seems a bit silly, and it seems that he is in celebration mode when I want him to be in "let's get to work" mode.  Again, some people are just like that, but when they put the helmet on, they get focused.  I want to see that "dawg" before I get overly excited.  The pick is growing on me, and if you broaden the scope to consider what was available in free agency and the draft, it makes sense.  I don't think we got lesser Edge rushers in the second and third rounds, frankly, than what we could have gotten in the first.
×
×
  • Create New...