Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Glorified Preseason Games?


UpstatePanther

Recommended Posts

Just thought of a different perspective than I've seen posted thus far. I am by no means a Shula apologist. He is 85% of the reason we performed so poorly yesterday on offense. But what if this is all part of the master plan? The 49ers and Bills are hardly teams worth opening up the playbook for. Maybe I'll have holes shot all through this here hot take, but maybe Shula is reserving more nuanced offensive play calling for a game that matters. Like... New England, Detroit, Philly, Tampa, Atlanta, Minnesota, and Green Bay. Maybe we won't get to see much of the "evolved" offense until we travel to Foxborough in Week 4. Maybe the hope is that by then, Cam will be near 100% and our offense will be getting some rhythm and timing. Maybe the coaching staff is playing close to the best these first 3 weeks to save any element of surprise for stiffer competition.

It's a good tactical move, IMHO. I just hope we don't rest on our laurels this week. Even with our stout defense, i expect The Mole to hang at least 14 on us. Our offense needs to be able to score at least 21 for us to have a hope of winning the game.

 

Anyway... what sayest thou, O Huddle? Is Shula playing close to the vest and giving out vanilla, preseason offense while we dispense with lesser teams to start the year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a sense, it's preseason for Cam and the receivers. Cam actually looked pretty solid for most of yesterday, and only missed a couple throws he would normally make almost certainly due to a lack of practice. On the other hand, I was extremely impressed with Cam's chemistry with Benjamin, Funchess, and McCaffery (that one throw aside). He trusts them and they are responding in turn.

I think we'll be much closer to 100% against New England.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, KendrickPanther said:

Just the general vibe on these boards... I've never seen this fanbase so upset to be 2-0. You would think we lost yesterday.

After drafting offense with our first 2 picks and listening to everyone preach about our offensive evolution only to come out and score 2 tds in 2 games, and looking like dog poo in the process, people have every right to be pissed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know that. I'm not predicting it. Just putting the information out there so I will have receipts for later on when this dude turns into a stud at this level too.  It's kinda bittersweet, he'd help our offense out a great deal, but I'm wanting a QB next draft, so adding another weapon for Bryce is counterproductive in that regard.
    • I'm not sure if NO will be as QB aggressive as some assume.  They may focus on landing a top line prospect and slow rolling the rebuild for next year.  Could see them roll the dice in R3-4 to compete with Rattler, maybe a Howard fit.     I think the QB starved team's just take the gamble the Saints don't want Sanders, and target a mid to late 1st pick for a trade up to land him.  Still don't think Milroe or Shough are going R1.   But I think what may get lost in the trade up talk is about it being QB specific. A top team trying to get over the top could be the juicy trade (or two) that happens in round 1. Something I've flirted with is how aggressive Buffalo could be.  They have the ammunition for a big trade up, and I think Golden would pair super well with Coleman.  They need to cut to the chase and get playmakers there for Allen.  So yeah, love the idea of a BUF/ATL trade where they move up for him.  I'm even thinking about LAR getting aggressive for Warren or Loveland.  Imagine McVay rolling into 2026 with that added piece for a future QB...      
    • Unfortunately, Ice, there are some blueprints of hybrid LB/edge players who were busts too--Everette Brown is one, but he was forced into a 4-3 DE role here.  I would say that the 3-4 defense has a lot of wiggle room for hybrids at the OLB/Edge position--I am just not seeing Walker as an elite player at any one role.  Coverage?  Rushing the passer from the 9?  And at his size... If we take him, I hope that I am wrong because there are some personalities I really would love to be on this roster.  Jihaad Campell is one.  Bech is another. 
×
×
  • Create New...