Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Falcons Beasley out possibly a month


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Dingo_ate_Babies said:

As long as that offense keeps playing like it has been, then losing Beasley for a month won't matter much.

If we can all point at our weak opponents to dismiss our Defense, what the hell does that say about ATLs Offense?

Chicago and GB?  Real top notch defensive squads there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thomas96 said:

Darryl Williams dominated him last year, no?

No Falcons used Beasley as a QB spy against Cam last year. 

 

1 hour ago, ncsportsfan1234 said:

Beasley is Overated.

Oh because of the pressures he's overrated? Lol How can you be overrated when you lead the NFL in sacks and forced fumbles in year 2? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, L-TownCat said:

If we can all point at our weak opponents to dismiss our Defense, what the hell does that say about ATLs Offense?

Chicago and GB?  Real top notch defensive squads there.

Going off YPG so far, Green Bay is ranked 8th, but Chicago is 24th. But going by points allowed GB is 14th by allowing 43 total points and Chicago is ranked 5th while allowing 52 total points. So yeah, definitely not two of the greatest defenses by any means. The Panthers however are ranked 1st in YPG allowing only 196.5 and 32nd In Total Points Allowed with 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know that. I'm not predicting it. Just putting the information out there so I will have receipts for later on when this dude turns into a stud at this level too.  It's kinda bittersweet, he'd help our offense out a great deal, but I'm wanting a QB next draft, so adding another weapon for Bryce is counterproductive in that regard.
    • I'm not sure if NO will be as QB aggressive as some assume.  They may focus on landing a top line prospect and slow rolling the rebuild for next year.  Could see them roll the dice in R3-4 to compete with Rattler, maybe a Howard fit.     I think the QB starved team's just take the gamble the Saints don't want Sanders, and target a mid to late 1st pick for a trade up to land him.  Still don't think Milroe or Shough are going R1.   But I think what may get lost in the trade up talk is about it being QB specific. A top team trying to get over the top could be the juicy trade (or two) that happens in round 1. Something I've flirted with is how aggressive Buffalo could be.  They have the ammunition for a big trade up, and I think Golden would pair super well with Coleman.  They need to cut to the chase and get playmakers there for Allen.  So yeah, love the idea of a BUF/ATL trade where they move up for him.  I'm even thinking about LAR getting aggressive for Warren or Loveland.  Imagine McVay rolling into 2026 with that added piece for a future QB...      
×
×
  • Create New...