Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Peppers: This is the the best defense I've been on


TN05

Recommended Posts

Last year the Bills were the number one rushing team in the league. Not much has changed on the field for them and we held McCoy, one of the best RBs in the league, to what, 10 yards?  Almost all of their rushing yards were Taylor and he only got like 30. So yea, they're not a good passing team but they're a great rushing team. We shut down both aspects. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AU-panther said:

Have we played a good offense or QB yet?

Taylor's not so bad at all and McCoy and that offensive line are both top 5 and we completely shut down their run game. There are of course better offenses out there, but I wouldn't say today's performance on D is anything to overlook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackofalltrades said:

6 points in two weeks is rare, despite the quality of opponents. So far they look incredible but the true tests are still upcoming. 

Very rare indeed.  1st time we've ever done it.

 

 

edit: before a stat nerd jumps in, 1st time allowed 3 or fewer pts consecutive weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I wouldn't judge it based on how we do against the Patriots either.  Will have to look at the entire body of work at the end of the season.  

Ok want ya wanna discuss then?  Maybe the pass rush of that 2008 squad?  How about the DT rotation of the 03 boys?

 

or maybe?

We discuss the team in front of our faces right now?

ffs people...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Ok want ya wanna discuss then?  Maybe the pass rush of that 2008 squad?  How about the DT rotation of the 03 boys?

 

or maybe?

We discuss the team in front of our faces right now?

ffs people...

Geez, relax.  All I meant was that if we can't use the results against bad teams, we can't use results of 1 game against one of the best of all time.  .  We have played well on the defensive side so far.  

 

Are you sure you meant to quote me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Davidson Deac II said:

Geez, relax.  All I meant was we can't use the results of any one game.  We have played well on the defensive side so far.  

I get the big picture stuff, but you can't just postpone commentary until the end of the season.  2 weeks in, good returns, still good after the next 2 and you can call that a pattern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, L-TownCat said:

I get the big picture stuff, but you can't just postpone commentary until the end of the season.  2 weeks in, good returns, still good after the next 2 and you can call that a pattern.

I think you meant to quote the other guy.  I was trying to say that if you can't use results against bad teams as a barometer, you can't  use results against one of the best of all time either (brady).  Brady makes very good defenses look pedestrian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I think you meant to quote the other guy.  I was trying to say that if you can't use results against bad teams as a barometer, you can't  use results against one of the best of all time either (brady).  Brady makes very good defenses look pedestrian.

Nah, I quoted the right one.

After 4 weeks bad QB good QB no QB if this D keeps crushing like this you'll have as much info as you could need to make a solid report on what this defense will be moving forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jackofalltrades said:

6 points in two weeks is rare, despite the quality of opponents. So far they look incredible but the true tests are still upcoming. 

Just saw a stat on Facebook, apparently this is the first time since 2006 that 6 pts or less were allowed through the first two games of a season.  7th time in history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...