Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dalvin Cook


RumHam

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, mjligon said:

Your desperate cries for attention are comical.

-Says the saints D is terrible 

-The niners D is worst 

-says Cook got most of his yards in garbage time

-Cook got most of his yards in the first 3Q

-says it's great to be able to run the ball in to waste the clock

-that's exactly what Cook does

-brings up garbage time when Minny was only up 10 most of the game

-forgets to mention the panthers were up 20 and still couldn't run the ball.

 

1*MINb-ejYCab5RKkhqAplDA.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not a Dalvin Cook vs CMac question. This is a Dalvin Cook vs Curtis Samuel argument. 

Cook was there in the 2nd round.

Being Objective... if you tell me that we could have had in our backfield this year... Jonathan Stewart, Christian McCaffrey, and Dalvin Cook... 

I dont see anything stupid about bringing up that it was a very real possibility because he was there at 40. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mjligon said:

The other aren't worth attacking because they're mostly your opinion of how the 49er defense is awful but the Saints defense is GOAT.

The others are not worthy cause you have no base to respond. You come out looking like a giant hypocrite 

 

btw I know the saints defense is utter trash, just like the niners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

The others are not worthy cause you have no base to respond. You come out looking like a giant hypocrite 

 

btw I know the saints defense is utter trash, just like the niners.

Or I don't feel the need to dispute anything the punchline of the Huddle spews out of his mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, RumHam said:

Just to remind everyone, we still should have taken him. 127 yards and beating the Taints? Would have looked better in Black and Blue.

Can we impose a huddle referendum on hindsight rules when we get to the next offseason?  I think there should be clear penalties for this.  For example if you randomly throw up a "we should have drafted X player instead" and there is no background for that you need to be banned for a week or something... If you do this you need to provide evidence that you made this point previously.

Even if you wanted to draft player X and posted about it there should be a 2 game grace period for bitching and you need to reference it.  I was never a CMC over the top fan of the pick but damn, give him a chance and put things into some perspective before melting down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Again you have no comeback. It's fun deciphering  the common huddle mouth breather.

Lol ok guy you pissed and moaned all offseason about how should have drafted the GOAT Dalvin Cook...now you are wagering bets against this team because you want to be right on the internet.

You are a sad little man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mjligon said:

Lol ok guy you pissed and moaned all offseason about how should have drafted the GOAT Dalvin Cook...now you are wagering bets against this team because you want to be right on the internet.

You are a sad little man.

I wager bets to win easy money from mouth breather like you. You came in the wrong thread if expected some misinformed bias delusional fanboy takes. Wait for another Saca thread for that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...