Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How many PPG do we have to score?

L-TownCat

By L-TownCat,
in Carolina Panthers

How many avg PPG do we need?  

31 members have voted

  1. 1. AVG PPG


Recommended Posts

Doc Holiday Grand Master

Doc Holiday

Posted
Posted

The more points the better, but if our defense holds par for the season with their current expectations we should be safe anytime we score more than 20 points,  but we won't be the super bowl contender we hope we will be unless Cam and the offense get their act together.

For the record I saw some Cam hate yesterday, the dude barely did anything before the regular season started, and he is going to need a month or two to get into full 100% game shape probably.  So I know its not pretty at the moment but he should and I hope he gets better as the season goes on. Also Cam is our best hope for a Super Bowl in the next 10 years whether you like it or not, so if you dont like him you need to get over that poo the Panthers success rides on his shoulders.

MVP Franchise QB's do not grow on trees, and finding them are like winning the lottery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gmonjimbo Community Regular

gmonjimbo

Posted
Posted

I think 28-30 points per game is the magic number for this offense.

They have a few things to work on with getting more players involved in the passing game and Cam getting his timing back(we started to see signs of that in the second half).

Overall, What I took from the offense is that they already have an identity, which is physicality. They literally grinded out the last 8 minutes or so of that game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Trading Down Could be a Gold Mine in This Draft!!

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      This is why it's probably going to be hard to trade down. This draft is fairly light on top tier talent but pretty deep in talent of that next tier down. I don't think there's going to be a lot of teams clamoring to move up and numerous teams might be entertaining moving down. Not a good market to trade down if that's the case. 
    • Hoenheim
      Trading Down Could be a Gold Mine in This Draft!!

      By Hoenheim · Posted

      And if they can't find a reasonable trade down (I think we would need a 2nd rounder this year bare minimum to make any trade down worth it). I would definitely expect Dan to trade UP for an EDGE or LB in the top half of R2. Just makes too much sense. We also have a plethora of mid round picks to use as ammo. 
    • Hoenheim
      Trading Down Could be a Gold Mine in This Draft!!

      By Hoenheim · Posted

      I don't mean to make this a mock draft thread particularly,  but every time I do a mock I have been investigating the talent that goes off the board between picks 8 and our low 2nd rounder pick 57. There is a gargantuan amount of talent still left on the board in the top half of the 2nd round every time I do one. Losing our original 2nd round pick to the Bears as the last pick of the Bryce trade stings badly .  I'm particularly looking at elite players like Carson Schwesinger (LB), Luther Burden (WR), Matthew Golden (WR), Maxwell Hairston (CB) , Nick Scourton , Landon Jackson, Donavan Ezeraku (all DEs/OLBs) . The sweet spot in this draft really feels like pick 15 to 40 - ish. This is why the Bears should be making bank with this draft. I don't know how realistic a trade down is from 8, but if we could pick up any teams higher 2nd rounder and still grab their 1st? We'd be cooking with gas man.  Say for example we get Tet McMillan at pick 8, if you wait all the way to 57 you stand the chance of not getting any impact pass rushers in this draft. And I don't think this team can afford that.  I'd personally love for them to take a break from drafting wrs in R1 or R2 (i think we've taken one in the top 2 rounds in the majority of the past few years), and stick to repairing the nfls worse defense in history (in terms of total points against iirc, or was it yards? Also included my most recent mock as an example . Don't put too much into the  late round selections lol  
×
×
  • Create New...