Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Opening Sunday matchups


Amos Moses

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Borat said:

Barely squeaking by the sack-sack bears (only 23 points scored) does not bode well. 

Well.. It's hard to tell anything about the first week of the season. But there's going to be some type of a hangover. I feel like if you guys had lost that game, it would have been the beginning of a season like we had last season. But you won.. So who knows 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bozarden said:

Its infuriating! the season literally JUST started and the refs are already deciding games... Damn

I thought the reason for putting replay review on the league office was to improve the process? I mean damn, if you're not going to overturn THAT call, what ARE you going to overturn???

I don't blame the refs on the field. Sure, go ahead and call it a fumble on the field just in case. If you call it incomplete, the play is dead. You can't review it. So, call it a fumble and allow the replay process to do it's job. The replay process failed horrifically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Well.. It's hard to tell anything about the first week of the season. But there's going to be some type of a hangover. I feel like if you guys had lost that game, it would have been the beginning of a season like we had last season. But you won.. So who knows 

Great stand at the end -- can't say I would have bet on us holding for 4 downs with goal to go. Big props to Brooks Reed making himself useful for the first time in his Falcons tenure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Borat said:

Great stand at the end -- can't say I would have bet on us holding for 4 downs with goal to go. Big props to Brooks Reed making himself useful for the first time in his Falcons tenure. 

Yeah.. And the drops didn't help. It's a good thing for you guys that the bears remembered who they were haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...