Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you trust... part II


beastson

Recommended Posts

no, but that's not going to be an issue.

if we have a 4 man rush...hoyer won't have many options to throw to.

if we have an aggressive blitz happy defense like i think we will, he's not going to have much time to throw to anyone.

shanahan is still probably the best offensive mind in the league, but he doesn't have near the weapons and OL he had last year. hyde is really good. goodwin can take the top off, but is still far from a sure thing when the ball gets near his hand. garcon is respectable...i guess. neither are anywhere near julio jones caliber, though.

to say that hoyer is a mediocre QB would be generous, but the fact that he's familiar with shanahan will probably help him out getting started. the OL is going to present some big problems for shanahan's offense. they just haven't looked good. our DL and pass rush should have no problem foiling most of shanahan's plans all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, bull123 said:

Few secondary's can stop anybody without pressure....QB's are too good

This is true.  Doesn't matter how good the secondary is, a defense has to get to the qb eventually.  The real question is can our secondary hold the line long enough for the rushers to get to the qb?  I think we are better than last year at this time, but that isn't setting the bar all that high.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between Bradberry, Worley, Munnerlynn, and Webster, we know Bradberry is on the rise, Worley has the floor of a solid but spotty CB2, and Munnerlynn is a great NB.  Webster is promising in case Worley is struggling.  I forgot if Corn can come back on the IR designated to return but I think we will be solid if the DL generates solid pressure.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Fair enough. I never once said not supporting Tepper makes you a bad fan by the way. I can't stand the guy myself. You on the other hand don't like anything about the team. You can't stand the owner or the coach because his religion doesn't fall in line with how you feel it should so I'm curious why you are even a fan at this point? Hell, you like nothing about the team, why even be a fan these days?  We can go backs and forth about how many games we have been to and measure dicks if you want or but it doesn't matter. I've been to my fair share over the years. Some as a fan and some work related but I bet you have been to more due to my weekends being filled with some work I do at the collegiate level so I probably only average maybe 2-3 games per year tops. You have me beat there im sure. You are probably very correct on us not being the same in anything at all I am quite sure of that. If I'm a "mark" (as you put it) for not liking Tepper and not caring about Canales religion or his political beliefs or letting it have weight on whether or not I like the team then call me a "mark" but you're still a whiny bitch either way.  When you hate everything about leadership from their personalities to their religious beliefs all the way to who they vote for at that point why even be a fan? I can side with you judging by your beliefs that you have made apparent, if you owned and coached the team, I sure as hell would find a new one to support but as you said we are different. Enjoy Norway, it is a beautiful country. Visited last year myself and absolutely loved it.
    • The playing well part, depends on what happens going forward. It could have been a tease that will dig our hole deeper.  In the small picture of one game, probably his best game. Green Bay wasn't as great as people think it was. More like one good quarter. Followed by two games of exactly nothing. 
    • Oh, it was handled horrifically.  Ego got in the way of a plan.  I'm just saying, that he actually probably stumbled into the better outcome/plan.  
×
×
  • Create New...