Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mario Addison is Ripped


UpstatePanther

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, UpstatePanther said:

From his Facebook profile:

IMG_1149.JPG.91fff8ed3eccecd0f03dc3707ae9a966.JPG

<img alt="IMG_1149.JPG.91fff8ed3eccecd0f03dc3707ae9a966.JPG" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="40168" src="http://www.carolinahuddle.com/boards/uploads/monthly_2017_09/IMG_1149.JPG.91fff8ed3eccecd0f03dc3707ae9a966.JPG"/>

Mainly posting this cus I thought DE's were generally alittle pudgy, including Addison. Didn't think they were in this kind of shape lol. But it brings other thoughts to my head:

Cam leaner & healthy.

Benji leaner & driven.

Kuechly healthy & hungry.

really seems like this team is focused and taking a very business-like approach to the season. I gotta admit that I'm super excited. I have a feeling the Panthers are about to light the league on fire.

 This photo.... I can see things.... I really did not sign up for>>>>>>>> this should not have been posted on Facebook at all 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Very good shape for a DE. "Ripped" comes from mom and dad. Plenty of really good athletes never have a physique that belongs on the cover of Men's Fitness while some couch potatoes can hit the gym for a couple of months and look the part. It's genetics.

Lol

Not quite. And, yes, abs shape and ability to show is 70% genetics 20% body fat and 10% actual strength.

People don't realize absolutely anyone can 'looked ripped' it has zero to do with strength and everything to do with body fat. Build muscle then cut the fat. But if the average dude drops body fat and eats protein, they'll looked ripped.

Strength itself requires fat. The strongest men in the world have pudge. That jacked ripped guy in the magazine's spent years looking tubby lifting weights before shedding the fat. Once he's cut he will not be as strong, he will lift much less weight in the gym. After years of weighlifting I myself have experienced this, you are strongest when you're bigger.

The issue is the media and magazine's and movies etc. give the impression really low body fat equals strength which is a very ignorant perspective.

Genetics do play a factor but more often than not determination and other factors outweigh genetics.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, UpstatePanther said:

From his Facebook profile:

IMG_1149.JPG.91fff8ed3eccecd0f03dc3707ae9a966.JPG

Mainly posting this cus I thought DE's were generally alittle pudgy, including Addison. Didn't think they were in this kind of shape lol. But it brings other thoughts to my head:

Cam leaner & healthy.

Benji leaner & driven.

Kuechly healthy & hungry.

really seems like this team is focused and taking a very business-like approach to the season. I gotta admit that I'm super excited. I have a feeling the Panthers are about to light the league on fire.

Not what I would consider ripped. Honestly, he looks no different or possible less fit than people I work out with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lumps said:

Lol

Not quite. And, yes, abs shape and ability to show is 70% genetics 20% body fat and 10% actual strength.

People don't realize absolutely anyone can 'looked ripped' it has zero to do with strength and everything to do with body fat. Build muscle then cut the fat. But if the average dude drops body fat and eats protein, they'll looked ripped.

Strength itself requires fat. The strongest men in the world have pudge. That jacked ripped guy in the magazine's spent years looking tubby lifting weights before shedding the fat. Once he's cut he will not be as strong, he will lift much less weight in the gym. After years of weighlifting I myself have experienced this, you are strongest when you're bigger.

The issue is the media and magazine's and movies etc. give the impression really low body fat equals strength which is a very ignorant perspective.

Genetics do play a factor but more often than not determination and other factors outweigh genetics.

 

So where do we disagree? You say it's 70% genetics which I would pretty much agree with then you spend the rest of your post contridicting that statement. I have no idea what you think after reading that schizophrenic post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...