Seahawks Trying To Trade Jermaine Kearse

[Saca312]

Would definitely upgrade the Panthers WR corps and add a pretty reliable option. If he were to be cut, I'd love to see us try and pursue him. What would you trade for Kearse?

 

[*FreeFua*]

I would cum a buckets worth if this happened

 

Trade Lee for a 6 or 7 and send Seattle that pick 

[Byrdman4real]

They can have Funchess 

[Nails]

Just getting him out of there is a huge win for us.

[*FreeFua*]

To have so many WR's that cutting Jermaine Kearse makes sense...

Damn that must be nice 

[Eazy-E]

I don't get the hype. Besides beating up on us every time we play the Seahawks he hasn't done much.

[Hogmolliesmaht]

3 minutes ago, Byrdman4real said:

They can have Funchess 

Why? Compare his first two years in the league with Funchess first two years in the league. Funchess blows him away. The only reason to make this trade is if there are no signs that Funchess can develop any further, and I don't believe that's the case.

[Byrdman4real]

3 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

Why? Compare his first two years in the league with Funchess first two years in the league. Funchess blows him away. The only reason to make this trade is if there are no signs that Funchess can develop any further, and I don't believe that's the case.

I was joking really. I'm willing to give him another year to prove himself unlike others. 

[*FreeFua*]

LOL at Funchess being a reason for not making a trade

Wow, I've now seen it all

[Hogmolliesmaht]

9 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

I don't get the hype. Besides beating up on us every time we play the Seahawks he hasn't done much.

He's pretty good now but I don't know where would we put him in the line up or  what would we trade for him. Everybody loves to bash Funchess, but as I already pointed out, Funchess is way ahead of where Kearse was at the same point in his career so I believe it would be a big mistake to give up on a young up and coming player for Kearse.

[Hogmolliesmaht]

9 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

LOL at Funchess being a reason for not making a trade

Wow, I've now seen it all

Funchess had more than twice the production as Kearse at the same point in their respective careers. Look it up. I'm not exactly saying that Funchess is a reason not to go after Kearse, but I think it would be foolish to trade player for player before we even give Funchess time to develop like Kearse did. Also, the idea of trading a draft pick to Seattle for ANYBODY makes my stomach turn.

[KillerKat]

Give em Funch and Gano

[Saca312]

2 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

LOL at Funchess being a reason for not making a trade

Wow, I've now seen it all

Would rather have Kearse than Funchess tbh.

[KillerKat]

Funch can't even make it to 500 yards yet Kearse has done it 3 times with one of them over 600.