UEFA Champions League

[pantherphan96]

City literally had 2 goals wrongly called offside while Liverpool scored an offside goal that was not called. Hilarious to see them lose in the final.

[tiger7_88]

41 minutes ago, pantherphan96 said:

City literally had 2 goals wrongly called offside while Liverpool scored an offside goal that was not called. Hilarious to see them lose in the final.

OK, lets change those.

Liverpool wins on aggregate (without bitching about any of the bad calls that went against them unless you live in a fantasy world where that didn't happen):

4-3.

Happy now? lol

[rodeo]

6 hours ago, ARSEN said:

Relax.  Both Liverpool and City had amazing seasons.  As an Arsenal fan, I’m sure jealous.

im not sure i'd call liverpool's 0 trophies an amazing season haha

[Ja Rhule]

13 minutes ago, rodeo said:

im not sure i'd call liverpool's 0 trophies an amazing season haha

Ohhhh no u didn’t :p

[pantherphan96]

36 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

OK, lets change those.

Liverpool wins on aggregate (without bitching about any of the bad calls that went against them unless you live in a fantasy world where that didn't happen):

4-3.

Happy now? lol

Except that's not how it works. The first leg would have had a different score and affected the strategy going into the 2nd leg. City didn't play all that well and didn't react all that well to adversity, but its disingenuous to believe that those calls didn't have a massive impact on the course of both legs and the ultimate result.

[tiger7_88]

4 minutes ago, pantherphan96 said:

Except that's not how it works. The first leg would have had a different score and affected the strategy going into the 2nd leg. City didn't play all that well and didn't react all that well to adversity, but its disingenuous to believe that those calls didn't have a massive impact on the course of both legs and the ultimate result.

And, again, only counting the calls that went against City and excluding the ones that went against Liverpool is also "not how it works".

Unless you are of the belief that every bad call went against City and every good call went in favor of Liverpool?

A simple missed foul against City MIGHT have eventually resulted in a Liverpool goal in the land of Ifs and Maybes that you want to play.

But you want to pretend that you should be able to overturn all of City's bad breaks and ONLY change that.

But, as you say, that's "not how it works". 

[pantherphan96]

9 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

And, again, only counting the calls that went against City and excluding the ones that went against Liverpool is also "not how it works".

Unless you are of the belief that every bad call went against City and every good call went in favor of Liverpool?

A simple missed foul against City MIGHT have eventually resulted in a Liverpool goal in the land of Ifs and Maybes that you want to play.

But you want to pretend that you should be able to overturn all of City's bad breaks and ONLY change that.

But, as you say, that's "not how it works". 

3 calls that directly affected 3 goals.

Fair to criticize a potential foul but its on Liverpool that they completely stopped defending despite the ref not calling a foul directly leading to a goal.

Would City have won if the calls were different? Maybe. My point is Liverpool is fortunate to even make the CL Final so its funny to see them bitch about the refs.

[tiger7_88]

2 hours ago, pantherphan96 said:

3 calls that directly affected 3 goals.

Fair to criticize a potential foul but its on Liverpool that they completely stopped defending despite the ref not calling a foul directly leading to a goal.

Would City have won if the calls were different? Maybe. My point is Liverpool is fortunate to even make the CL Final so its funny to see them bitch about the refs.

Please point out the bitching about the refs, sir.

(To help you, I am bitching about King Red Card Ramos' dirty ass, not the ref.  I actually think the play itself would have been damned difficult for a ref to see in real-time and I place no blame on him for the situation AT ALL.   So please, motherfuger, do point out all the bitching I've done about refs.  Dis gon' be good.)

[pantherphan96]

16 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

Please point out the bitching about the refs, sir.

(To help you, I am bitching about King Red Card Ramos' dirty ass, not the ref.  I actually think the play itself would have been damned difficult for a ref to see in real-time and I place no blame on him for the situation AT ALL.   So please, motherfuger, do point out all the bitching I've done about refs.  Dis gon' be good.)

Not you, but I've seen plenty from Liverpool fans. Especially about Ramos/Salah incident.

[tiger7_88]

Just now, pantherphan96 said:

Not you, but I've seen plenty from Liverpool fans. Especially about Ramos/Salah incident.

Well, there's not a fan-base on earth without fans who will bitch about officiating.

Even *I* will bitch about officating.

But when I do, I'm alway right. 

(P.S. Madrid deservedly won.  Liverpool were behind the 8-ball coming into that match.  Madrid's quality is apparent to the last player on their bench.  They brought in Bale OFF THE FUGGING BENCH for God's sake.  Liverpool didn't and doesn't have that luxury.  I still believe it would have been a 50-50 game between the starting 11 if Ramos hadn't thugged 'Pools best player off the field.  Still, Liverpool didn't do what they had to do.  Still proud of Liverpool and hoping for a good summer of roster additions.)