Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dae Dae


Easymac27

Recommended Posts

How do we feel so far about deashon hall ?

i know it's early , but im a little concerned about his bend and overall flexibility. There were some decent players on the board.......even though we need to groom some young DEs. Seems like the motor is there, just wanna see him finish some plays in the next few PS games 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Easymac27 said:

How do we feel so far about deashon hall ?

i know it's early , but im a little concerned about his bend and overall flexibility. There were some decent players on the board.......even though we need to groom some young DEs. Seems like the motor is there, just wanna see him finish some plays in the next few PS games 

His athletic traits are on par with Solomon Thomas and Myles Garrett, just needs to fix a lot of that technique and bend. He's a project who will be pretty good down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Easymac27 said:

How do we feel so far about deashon hall ?

i know it's early , but im a little concerned about his bend and overall flexibility. There were some decent players on the board.......even though we need to groom some young DEs. Seems like the motor is there, just wanna see him finish some plays in the next few PS games 

Well he did pretty well in the preseason game getting legitimate push and pressure. I mean, sure I'd like him to actually sack the QB, but pressure and hurries shouldn't be understated. 

At this point I'll take it---with a grain if salt, no doubt---but I'll take it. When a rookie that wasn't quite where he needed to be to be taken in the first couple of rounds shows signs of development this early on, albeit against backups, it's a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jimmy said:

He's fast as hell...work on his hands and we might have a Jason Taylor type with time.

If he somehow morphs into Jason Taylor 2.0, then this may turn out to be the Panthers' best draft in franchise history, of course provided that Samuel and CMC are who many think they are and Moton continues to progress! Yeah, maybe some big "ifs," but not so unbelievable in terms of the latter three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...