Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Salary Cap Implications and our Roster.


Recommended Posts

As the team enters the preseason and prepares for the big cut, it is interesting to see how current cap figures play into the decisions made by the front office.  I have compiled a list of players, who if are cut, will save the Panthers on cap room.  Of course, a number of these players are not going anywhere.  My passion is looking at the salary cap and team building.  If this does not interest you, please, evacuate this thread. 

Charles Johnson: Cap hit (4.36), Dead Cap (0) = 4.36 mil savings.  The Panthers unofficial depth chart currently has CJ listed as starting at the left DE position.  He likely isn't going anywhere. Though, with Peppers, Addison, Horton, and Hall also competing for this position it is not 100%. 

Greg Olsen: Cap hit (10.35), Dead Cap (6.6) = 3.75 mil savings. Just skip past this. Given our lack of depth at TE and his prolific numbers, Olsen is more likely to see an extension than a cut. 

Graham Gano: Cap hit (4), Dead Cap (.75) = 3.25 mil savings.  This is the first cut that would actually make sense.  Harrison Butker is on a cheap, 7th round rookie contract.  IMO, Gano is going to have to seriously outperform Butker to make his 3.25 million in cap savings worth it. I am calling this one early, Gano gets cut or traded before the season. 

Andrew Norwell: Cap Hit (2.75), Dead Cap (0) = 2.75 mil savings.  Norwell is another player more likely to see an extension than a cut.  Current backups Dan France, David Yankey, and Chris Scott have not outperformed Norwell by any stretch of the imagination and Silatolu is actually listed as the backup LT at this point.

Ed Dickson: Cap Hit (2.72), Dead Cap (.67) = 2.05 mil savings.  My second cut prediction from this list.  While the Panthers have had difficulty finding that #2 TE, Dickson has not separated himself from Chris Manhertz, Scott Simonson, or Eric Wallace. At least not enough to justify the 2.05 million in cap savings. 

Julius Peppers: Cap hit (3.5), Dead Cap (1.65) = 1.85 mil savings. The prodigal son returns.  While a busy DE group may limit his snaps, it is hard to imagine the front office spoiling this home-coming. 

Thomas Davis: Cap hit (8.25), Dead cap (6.475) = 1.775 mil savings.  TD is a fascinating case.  In any other franchise, his snaps are limited by up and coming talent.  Between Shaq Thompson, Jeremy Cash, and the Panthers propensity to play 2 LB sets, TD would be looking at a restructure (pay cut) and eventually shown the door.  However, in bizzaro Panther world, he will likely be given a raise and extension.  

Derek Anderson: Cap Hit (2.24), Dead Cap (.5) = 1.74 mil savings.  The Panthers have painted themselves into a corner by not bringing on solid backup QB talent.  DA has been performing relatively sub-par, maybe to a point of being supplanted by Garrett Gilbert.  I believe there is actual competition here for the backup QB spot, though no one in the media has alluded to it. DA is 34 years old and in the final year of his contract.  

Kelvin Benjamin: Cap Hit (2.44), Dead Cap (.97) = 1.47 mil savings.  Many comments in the media are pointing to struggles by KB.  He is too valuable to cut, but could a trade be possible? With Hurney at GM, I won't say it is impossible.  Seems like a move that in hindsight makes a lot of sense, but would blindside (no pun intended) the fan-base.  

Next year, the Panthers are going to be in a very difficult spot Cap-wise.  They already have allocated 166 million towards the cap and will have approximately 11.5 million in cap space. This will be somewhat alleviated by the 15 million they are set to rollover.  But, Norwell and Star will need to be re-signed.  Olsen and Davis are looking for money as well. This team better be motivated to trim cap before the start of the season.  I believe that starts with Gano, Dickson, and possibly DA.  These moves add an additional 7 million to the rollover and leave us room to resign our own and still be flexible in FA.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, sanjay_rajput said:

I would cut Lee  as well couple of extra million will help extend Norwell & Star. 

Cutting Andy Lee saves us hardly anything as he is under contract through next year.  In 2018, he can be cut for about 1.7 MIL in savings. But his dead money escalators cancel out any cap savings for 2017.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Leeroy Jenkins PhD said:

Cutting Andy Lee saves us hardly anything as he is under contract through next year.  In 2018, he can be cut for about 1.7 MIL in savings. But his dead money escalators cancel out any cap savings for 2017.  

especially when we can cut Palardy instead

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Leeroy Jenkins PhD said:

Cutting Andy Lee saves us hardly anything as he is under contract through next year.  In 2018, he can be cut for about 1.7 MIL in savings. But his dead money escalators cancel out any cap savings for 2017.  

Sanjay is mentally deficient he is fond of spewing dumb poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Leeroy Jenkins PhD said:

DA has been performing relatively sub-par, maybe to a point of being supplanted by Garrett Gilbert.  I believe there is actual competition here for the backup QB spot,

interesting thread, thanks.

DA's bad play is definitely not being talked about much.  I guess because with Cam coming off surgery and currently not throwing he's deemed untouchable.  But I am less than thrilled with the idea of DA starting a game for us the way he's looked.  Maybe his arm is tired from all the added reps given Cam's been out?

I hope we keep Gilbert on the PS at least, and we absolutely need to look for a new QB2 for next year.  Probably way too late for this year.  Gilbert has looked quite good from all accounts.  Preseason games could be very interesting to see him on a bigger stage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...