Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Defense vs the NFC South Offenses.


NFC South Offenses   

114 members have voted

  1. 1. Which NFC South offense will give the Panthers Defense the most trouble?

    • Bucs
      19
    • Falcons
      69
    • Saints
      14
    • None
      12


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Not that impressed with either. Freeman is extremely inefficient, he has just had large workloads. Coleman's year last year was a product of Shanahan designing plays for him in space, particularly as a receiver. I hope to god you guys do get that megadeal done with Freeman. It'll be like us with D-Will and Stew all over again except Freeman isn't even good or worth even top 15 RB money. Oh, and they are both terrible in pass protection. Maybe Freeman should focus more on improving in that important area than on trying to get top 5 RB money, which you guys just may be stupid enough to give him.

Based on what he's inefficient? You mention heavy work load yet Freeman had less carries than anyone in the top 10(rushing yards) last year. 

Freeman is also the only back in the league to go over a 1000 yards in consecutive seasons. His change of direction and feet are elite despite not having great break away speed.  You really think the Falcons would have one of the best scoring offense of all time with out Freeman and Coleman? But yeah neither are very good....to be honest you are the first person I've ever seen that said Freeman isn't very good. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

The Saints did not sign Ted Ginn to replace Brandin Cooks.

The Saints did not sign Ted Ginn to replace Brandin Cooks.

THE SAINTS DID NOT SIGN TED GINN TO REPLACE BRANDIN COOKS!!!!

Ah. Forgot to mention Michael Thomas, who's already itching towards being a top tier WR. Based on that, I think the Saints actually have a better offense than the Falcons and even the Bucs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Ball4life said:

Based on what he's inefficient? You mention heavy work load yet Freeman had less carries than anyone in the top 10(rushing yards) last year. 

Freeman is also the only back in the league to go over a 1000 yards in consecutive seasons. His change of direction and feet are elite despite not having great break away speed.  You really think the Falcons would have one of the best scoring offense of all time with out Freeman and Coleman? But yeah neither are very good....to be honest you are the first person I've ever seen that said Freeman isn't very good. 

 

Freeman is way better than Stewart. Your in the panthers forum, people in here have homer goggles on 24/7

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oddly enough, even though we tend to allow the Saints the most points, they are the division rival we have beaten most often since 2012 (7-3 record).  Our worst record in the past 5 years is vs Atlanta (5-5).

Here are points allowed by Panthers Defense vs NFC South Rivals since 2012:

597f8adf83700_PointsAllowedvsNFCSouth2012-2016.png.c10e8b4d6bbae37c18a03379ba203e2d.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pantherphan96 said:

Saints have the most dangerous QB, Tampa has big bodies like Evans and now Howard, but still the Falcons have good receiving RB's and Julio. Probably the best OL out of the 3 as well.

Shanahan also made that o-line better believe it or not, although Mack is legit.

Right now, their RG is in a pretty bad spot. It's like deciding between Remmers and Chandler for the spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KSpan said:

I was genuinely surprised at how inept their offense looked in the second game last year. Hopefully a sign of things to come this year.

I chalk it up to playing outdoors and being a Thursday night game. Saints in the Superbowl have been shootouts lately. I doubt that will change regardless of our defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, saints4lifeagain said:

The Saints did not sign Ted Ginn to replace Brandin Cooks.

The Saints did not sign Ted Ginn to replace Brandin Cooks.

THE SAINTS DID NOT SIGN TED GINN TO REPLACE BRANDIN COOKS!!!!

It doesn't matter brother. Your D will allow 50 a game so it won't matter that you put up 40. Have fun sucking until Brees retires and you get a new coaching staff that cares about the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Shanahan also made that o-line better believe it or not, although Mack is legit.

Right now, their RG is in a pretty bad spot. It's like deciding between Remmers and Chandler for the spot.

He made the o-line too? How?

Wouldn't go that far on RG yet. I think Schweitzer wins the spot and he hasn't played one snap in the regular season yet so it's impossible to tell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I think Atlanta will go to the Super Bowl jinx this year and they will have problems. Just like the Panthers, the patriots showed how to beat Atlanta in the second half of the Super Bowl, 

Pressuring Matt Ryan, basically wearing them down, which we can do with our running game. I'm not saying they'll be easy, but I think will do much better than we did last year. 

 I believe a much were worried about Tampa Bay, simply because like someone said the receivers are deadly in Winston is a decent quarterback that seems to do better when there's pressure. 

 Matt Ryan does great if there's no pressure, but as the patriot showed, once the pressure is applied he falls apart. 

 

New Orleans is always New Orleans but I think they'll never recover and be what they were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JARROD said:

 I think Atlanta will go to the Super Bowl jinx this year and they will have problems. Just like the Panthers, the patriots showed how to beat Atlanta in the second half of the Super Bowl, 

Pressuring Matt Ryan, basically wearing them down, which we can do with our running game. I'm not saying they'll be easy, but I think will do much better than we did last year. 

 I believe a much were worried about Tampa Bay, simply because like someone said the receivers are deadly in Winston is a decent quarterback that seems to do better when there's pressure. 

 Matt Ryan does great if there's no pressure, but as the patriot showed, once the pressure is applied he falls apart. 

 

New Orleans is always New Orleans but I think they'll never recover and be what they were.

Except Matt Ryan was #3 in the NFL last year in completion % when pressured. And Ryan had the 7th highest QB rating in superbowl history so not sure where you're getting this notion that he fell apart..Falcons fell apart not Ryan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ALL three are terrifying in their know unique ways.

Bucs with martin, Evans, Jackson, Howard, no weakness there if winston improves(smarter decisions, less TOs)

Saints- You could add the local flag football team to WRs/TEs and brees still would throw for 5,000

Falcons- Juilo is a man-beast and they have a REAL double trouble in two top 10 RBs. Coleman is better than freeman, IMO. If given time, meg ryan will make you pay. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...