Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Anyone Concerned About Cowher.....


fitty76

Recommended Posts

anyone worrying over a coach we don't have should find new hobbies.

Certainly, anyone thinking that buying a former Super Bowl winning coach guarantees anything should seriously reconsider that.

And for the record, Seifert inherited an offense. Nothing more. It was his defense. Then won a 2nd championship. And never went 8-8 there. By some of your expectations, he was a better choice than Cowher is now. No one knows what Cowher would actually do here, so it's hard to suggest that it matters three games into a season he's not coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, big difference. Bill Cowher built his team that won the super bowl. Siefert won with Walshs team that was loaded with super bowl talent when he took over.

16 years. It took 16 years for Cowher to win a Super Bowl.

I think that the people hoping for Cowher to come here are expecting instant wins when/if he does, and that is just stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have said it before. If your only reason for not wanting Cowher is because it took him 15 years to win the SB. It took Tom Landry 12 years to win one. If Jerry Jones hadn't paid off O'Donnell to throw two wide open interceptions, Cowher would have won one in his 6th season. Just admit you don't like Cowher and that is the reason you don't want him here. Personally I don't care, I would rather have a new coach over a retread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 years. It took 16 years for Cowher to win a Super Bowl.

I think that the people hoping for Cowher to come here are expecting instant wins when/if he does, and that is just stupid.

How many has John Fox won? You think he'll win one in less than 14 years? You people act like super bowl winning coaches grow on trees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the bright side, we have a DE that we gave up a #1 draft pick for that seems to me to be far better suited as a stand-up LB in the 3-4.

To be quite honest, I'm more worried about Fox. Hopefully, he'll figure out a way to win a few games so that we don't help build the 49ers house for the next several years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cowher won't become Seifert 2 because he won't coach here. Still, if you like the idea, here are the stats of the two coaches before Carolina.

Seifert: 98-30 (.766) with two superbowl wins in 8 seasons in SF. Overall playoff record: 10-5 (made playoffs 7 times in 8 seasons)

Cowher: 149-90-1 (.623) with one superbowl win in 15 seasons in Pittsburgh. Overall playoff record: 12-9 (made playoffs 10 times in 15 seasons)

You may now proceed to make excuses for Cowher, I know some of you are dieing to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These numbers do not measure a player's prime. Do these numbers include OL pulled up from the practice squad for a game or two then cut?  Do they include players who might have been injured or cut for reasons other than they were past their primes?  The average career for an NFL lineman is 3.63 years, and that is because there is a lot of turnover--regardless of a player's prime. In fact, if only 55% of Offensive linemen drafted in the first round succeed, then the failure rates of most offensive linemen drafted and undrafted would be much lower, cause them to skew the average age of the OL.  This suggests that most players' retirement from the NFL is not based on their prime, but other factors.  They are cut, released, injured--and that is based on their level of play compared to others, not their levels of play within their personal skill range--something that peaks during your prime. In this case, I was talking about Moton, an elite offensive tackle, one that avoided the factors that shorten careers unrelated to their primes. I identify Moton as the team's best offensive lineman on an impressive OL--that distinguishes the type of player being referenced, so I did not provide a lot of qualifiers--as you didn't with your stats.   In this article below, one that evaluates established Offensive tackles, it states the following, which supports my comment:  "Most elite offensive tackles start to decline at roughly the age of 32 if they haven’t already."  So to say that Moton was at the end of his prime was not a reach or careless speculation.  If a player has the skill to be competitive and they can avoid injuries, their career expectancy is much higher than an average of all offensive lineman on a fluid roster. https://www.milehighreport.com/2017/2/27/14724674/age-wall-for-offensive-tackles-nfl  
    • If there’s not much difference in moving back a couple spots, finding a good offer might be an issue.
    • Im all for defense. I’ll add Will Johnson and remove McMillian. While I’d rather have DL, two strong corners will allow for more safety help in the box, so it’s still a win for the run game.
×
×
  • Create New...