"The Carolina Panthers' Twitter Account Is Obsessed With Christian McCaffrey And It's Brilliant"

[Pantherxtreme]

2 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

yes, he did well in his second year in the league.

health is a skill that he doesn't have. you might as well be wishing kenjon barner was a better runner. 

no the panthers would not have gone to the superbowl in 2009 unless tom brady was their qb because their defense was old, injury prone and trash. 

Well to be fair there's no defense in the NFL that can make up for your Qb turning the ball over 6 times just saying.

[electro's horse]

Just now, Pantherxtreme said:

Well to be fair there's no defense in the NFL that can make up for your Qb turning the ball over 6 times just saying.

the Jets did it. 

[electro's horse]

2 minutes ago, 15 said:

here's some more stats from that guy that posted about Stewart that you think is irrelevant. figured this was relevant for your latest whiff.

 why do you root for this team?

This is accuracy. What is their metric for this?

His completion percentage (you know something judged by numbers) is in the mid twenties, if I recall correctly. 

You can cheer for a team and criticize them. People like you that blindly praise them are called zealots or fanatics. 

I've forgotten more about the Panthers than you'll ever know. I've seen more games than any person on this board with the exception of maybe zod. don't fuging talk to me about being a fan of this team. 

[electro's horse]

lol cian fahey is a random guy from ireland who randomly watches qbs and judges whether a pass is accurate or not, having no idea what the route was, where the break was, etc

if you look at cam last year and say "yeah he's third best in the league on passes within 15 yards" you are a fuging moron

[Saca312]

1 minute ago, electro's horse said:

This is accuracy. What is their metric for this?

His completion percentage (you know something judged by numbers) is in the mid twenties, if I recall correctly. 

And if you want to question Cian Fahey's credibility...

http://mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2017/06/19/peter-king-monday-morning-quarterback-nfl-randy-moss-commencement

Quote

This week on The MMQB Podcast With Peter King (dropping Wednesday morning), one of my guests is Cian Fahey, a 26-year-old Irish lad who is absolutely nuts about the NFL. He has just published his second book about quarterback play in the NFL (and maybe he could work on the title for the third edition): Pre-Snap Reads Quarterback Catalogue 2017.

Fahey watches every snap of every NFL game, to study quarterbacks. It’s really quite intense, and quite informative.

 

[Saca312]

3 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

lol cian fahey is a random guy from ireland who randomly watches qbs and judges whether a pass is accurate or not, having no idea what the route was, where the break was, etc

if you look at cam last year and say "yeah he's third best in the league on passes within 15 yards" you are a fuging moron

lmao. A moron who's been featured in the monday morning quarterback, ESPN, Football Outsiders, and a host of other sites. But keep it up. This is entertaining how stupid you're making yourself out to be.

[electro's horse]

4 minutes ago, 15 said:

completion percentage? you mean that stat ESPN made up to find something positive about The Golden Calf of Bristol?

espn invented dividing completions by attempts? are they 2000 year old arabs or something?

[electro's horse]

5 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

And if you want to question Cian Fahey's credibility...

http://mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2017/06/19/peter-king-monday-morning-quarterback-nfl-randy-moss-commencement

 

you still have not posted what "accuracy" means

[electro's horse]

Just now, 15 said:

QBR was never a topic until The Golden Calf of Bristol. 

also as saca just said, it doesn't factor in drops, issues with routes, throwing away while under pressure, and his general style of play. it's really a moot statistic.

 

who is talking about QBR? 

completion percentage is completions/attempts

cian fahey has no idea about the routes, or the playcalls, or any of that either. he's some dumb dude in ireland

[electro's horse]

my random metric is as good as yours

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/qb

[Saca312]

4 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

who is talking about QBR? 

completion percentage is completions/attempts

cian fahey has no idea about the routes, or the playcalls, or any of that either. he's some dumb dude in ireland

And if he's some dumb dude...here's his excerpt on Cam Newton:

Quote

Newton’s passes travelled more than 10 yards past the line of scrimmage on average. His 10.76 average depth of target ranked 1st in the league. Only once did Newton have a game where his average depth of target fell below eight yards. For comparison; Sam Bradford’s average depth of target was below eight yards in 13 of his 15 games. The Panthers’ passing game was so aggressive that more of Newton’s passes travelled 21+ yards downfield than did to or behind the line of scrimmage.

It stands to reason that the more frequently a quarterback throws the ball deep, the lower his accuracy rate will be. Cam struggled a bit with his accuracy throwing the ball within 5 yards of the line of scrimmage, but he was terrific in every other range. He was the second most accurate quarterback in the league in the 11-20 range and the eighth most accurate on passes that traveled more than 20 yards in the air.

Only one of the 33 quarterbacks that threw at least 200 passes in 2016 was let down by their receivers more. Newton lost 59 receptions to receiver error in just 510 pass attempts. In contrast, his receivers bailed him out just 11 times in those attempts, the 25th worst percentage among those charted. Accounting for these numbers, Newton lost 9.41 percentage points off his completion percentage and 1.48 yards per pass attempt, both most in the league.

38.24% of Newton’s passing yardage came after the catch, the third lowest mark in the league. The lack of a threat in the screen game didn’t help; only 4.79% of Newton’s passing yards came on screens. Only 4 quarterbacks had a lower percentage.

I think he understands our scheme, playcalling, and crap at wide receivers pretty well. Matt Harmon of NFL.com backs it up.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000769130/article/cam-newton-leads-nfls-top10-most-aggressive-qbs

Quote

No starting quarterback threw into tight windows more than Cam Newton in 2016, as 24.9 percent of his pass attempts went to a receiver who had less than one yard of separation.

What this stat provides us is a reminder that few quarterbacks operate in an environment that creates a higher degree of difficulty. The Panthers offensive design requires Newton to hit high-degree of difficulty passes both deep and outside the numbers. Even his 20.3 tight window percentage on passes that traveled fewer than 10 yards in the air trailed only the Rams' quarterbacks.

Benjamin checked in with the lowest average separation on his targets (1.8 yards) and Funchess, who barely got on the field anyway, came in with the fourth lowest (2.0) among receivers who saw 20 or more targets. Again, some of that comes back to the scheme Carolina runs.

 

[electro's horse]

hey saca FO uses spotters as well and cam newton is real bad does this do anything for the one person you keep throwing at me

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/qb

[Saca312]

3 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

hey saca FO uses spotters as well and cam newton is real bad does this do anything for the one person you keep throwing at me

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/qb

You do realize who made that, right?

Here's a hint. Look at that author of that book over on the left of the webpage.

@15 check this out. 

[electro's horse]

yeah he signed his name on something that contradicts his twitter

seems like he's a conflicted individual