Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stats: Greg Olsen Has The Potential To Be Even Deadlier With Our New Rookies

Saca312

By Saca312,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Saca312 Experienced

Saca312

Posted
Posted

Greg Olsen is arguably one of the league's best tight ends to date. His reliability, durability, and consistency enables him to be called one of the elite.

Coming off a third consecutive 1000 yard season - only TE in history to do so - it's hard to imagine him getting any better. However, when looking at the stats, his potential may have actually been limited.

The Panthers haven't had a true slot receiver last year, so Olsen was to compensate in that role. As the stats show, that was primarily where he was lined up most of the time.

However, it was obvious that wasn't the best way to use him.

As you can see, Olsen accounted for most of the work out of the slot, but it wasn't his best position. He produced far more when not there.

Olsen is at his best when he's able to exploit zone defenses and get himself open. For example, put him in a few flood concepts and let his route-running expertise and speed overtake the defense. Olsen coming from the slot limits what he's able to do.

With guys like McCaffrey, Samuel, and even Shepard at play to take snaps from the slot, Olsen is more free to be able to play where he's most deadly at. He potentially could be even better this upcoming season because of our new rookie additions, and that's a scary thought for the NFL.

Just one small little detail that shows how deadly our offense could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Maybe not having a true slot receiver is the reason our offense was stagnant instead of needing a second tight end?

I still can't wrap my mind around why we didn't simply run more tackle eligible plays. We were running all those double TE sets because we needed help in protection, but we almost exclusively used the second TE as a blocker. If you're going to use the guy almost exclusively as a blocker, just put another damn OL out there already instead of trying to use your backup TE as an extra blocker while rarely asking him to actually run a route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I still can't wrap my mind around why we didn't simply run more tackle eligible plays. We were running all those double TE sets because we needed help in protection, but we almost exclusively used the second TE as a blocker. If you're going to use the guy almost exclusively as a blocker, just put another damn OL out there already instead of trying to use your backup TE as an extra blocker while rarely asking him to actually run a route.

Because if you line him up as a second tight end defense don't know if he going to block or be a receiver. If you line up an extra OL you are limiting your options and signaling to the defense what you are going to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

Because if you line him up as a second tight end defense don't know if he going to block or be a receiver. If you line up an extra OL you are limiting your options and signaling to the defense what you are going to do.

I'm assuming they watched a little bit of tape on us. If they did, then they pretty much already knew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm assuming they watched a little bit of tape on us. If they did, then they pretty much already knew.

There is a difference between thinking they know what we are going to do and realizing we only a few choices based on the personnel we have on the field. The more the defense has to cover during a play the more likely they may be to make a mistake or not cover all of our options. You don't telegraph what you are going to do. Football 101.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Because if you line him up as a second tight end defense don't know if he going to block or be a receiver. If you line up an extra OL you are limiting your options and signaling to the defense what you are going to do.

Not really. The extra tackle can help with both run blocking and pass blocking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
Just now, panthers55 said:

There is a difference between thinking they know what we are going to do and realizing we only a few choices based on the personnel we have on the field. The more the defense has to cover during a play the more likely they may be to make a mistake or not cover all of our options. You don't telegraph what you are going to do. Football 101.

Ed Dickson: 478 snaps, 19 pass targets. That's less than 4% of the time that Dickson was on the field that he received a pass. It'd be interesting if anyone has compiled stats on the percentage of time a tackle eligible is targeted with a pass. I have a suspicion it wouldn't look much different than that. We were basically treating Dickson as a tackle eligible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Spanish Grand Master

Ricky Spanish

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I still can't wrap my mind around why we didn't simply run more tackle eligible plays. We were running all those double TE sets because we needed help in protection, but we almost exclusively used the second TE as a blocker. If you're going to use the guy almost exclusively as a blocker, just put another damn OL out there already instead of trying to use your backup TE as an extra blocker while rarely asking him to actually run a route.

In all fairness to the team, I don't think we had any linemen left at that point...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      I'm Sold on Drew Allar

      By strato · Posted

      I find it more like now that I have been forced to watch Young so much it isn’t as much of a shock to my senses.   Desensitized they call it.   For real, it just looks normal almost now. Where the first game of 2023 I wasn’t sure what I was looking at it was so out of bounds for NFL type play. I literally couldn’t make sense of what I had seen vs Atlanta that first week. 
    • strato
      Dan Morgan is an awful GM

      By strato · Posted

      Lynch in SF. Great is subjective but he has done pretty well there. 
    • Manna
      CJ Stroud

      By Manna · Posted

      Sure, except Stroud has the ability to stretch the field with deep passes. He did that often last night with ease, but couldn’t connect on many due to being flustered by the defense. BY9 gets flustered and can’t throw screens, let alone even think about any deeper passes. Stroud would’ve changed the franchise and done more with the situation last year. My thought at least.    the hope is that last year showed tepper that he needed to step back from football decisions. There’s a positive in most situations and maybe we’ll see a new tepper in the near future. 
×
×
  • Create New...