Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stephen A Smith: Cam Newton will be better than Andrew Luck this season.


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, UnluckyCharms said:

Luck is a better QB. Cam is a better player.

No.  What does that even mean?

This is one of those statements that lends credence to the myth that Cam is a Mike Vick one read and go QB.  It's just not true.  Cam is a QB simple and plain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hoenheim said:

What would luck do with the 2015 team? One could wonder.. 

You can wonder but what carried the 2015 team was attitude, confidence and emotion and that was mostly led by Cam. I see Luck is way more even keel which can be good as well as not as good. Otherwise we would start getting to unprovable hypotheticals that never get anyone anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, XOBlackxJokerOX said:


Probably go 6-10 or worse. Yes the defense bailed us out a few games but Luck isn't running or extending plays like Cam did that year.
Not saying you do but a lot of the talking heads fail to mention the Colts made sure he had weapons to throw to. If the O-line excuse doesn't work for us why does he get a pass?

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

Crazy talk there with the 6-10, and most analyst have mentioned the bad o-line play from our team last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

No.  What does that even mean?

This is one of those statements that lends credence to the myth that Cam is a Mike Vick one read and go QB.  It's just not true.  Cam is a QB simple and plain.

Cam is a QB. He's a great one. But Andrew Luck is a better Quarterback. Cam Newton is a better football player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

LOL! We wouldn't have gone 6-10 or worse with Luck in 2015. C'mon.

But, I certainly don't think we would've gone 15-1 either. My guess is 11-5ish.

The receivers would have dropped Luck's TD passes just like they dropped Cam's in 2015.

Would Luck have had the athletic ability and mental strength to make up for those drops like Cam Newton did?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tiger7_88 said:

The receivers would have dropped Luck's TD passes just like they dropped Cam's in 2015.

Would Luck have had the athletic ability and mental strength to make up for those drops like Cam Newton did?

Hence why I knocked 4 wins off the total. That's a huge difference in success.

But, it's just disrespectful to the rest of that team and quite frankly absurd to suggest that we would've gone from nearly perfect to sub-.500 by subbing Luck for Cam. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How so? You think Luck's getting 14 rushing TDs or using the weapons we have the way Cam has? I don't think so. Plus they (Colts) draft weapons for the kid year after year while we're over here excited that DG used the first three draft picks on offense. It's mind boggling. Yeah he may have better stats but those stats aren't doing anything for him in a weak AFC South.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tiger7_88 said:

The receivers would have dropped Luck's TD passes just like they dropped Cam's in 2015.

Would Luck have had the athletic ability and mental strength to make up for those drops like Cam Newton did?

I don't even like Luck but sheesh..... Because hes white you act like he isn't a heck of an athletic QB.... 

 

Dude is 237 6'4 ran a 4.67 40 had a fast three cone and vertical than Cam (short area quickness). 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...