Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You're not going to be too thrilled with this. DraftExpress has the Hornets NOW taking Luke Kennard.


Recommended Posts

ROUND 1
1. BOS - Markelle Fultz, PG, Washington
2. LAL - Lonzo Ball, PG, UCLA
3. PHI - Josh Jackson, SF, Kansas
4. PHX - De'Aaron Fox, PG, Kentucky 
5. SAC - Jayson Tatum, SF, Duke
6. ORL - Jonathan Isaac, SF, Florida State 
7. MIN - Lauri Markkanen, PF, Arizona
8. NYK - Malik Monk, SG, Kentucky 
9. DAL - Frank Ntilikina, PG, France
10. SAC - Dennis Smith, PG, NC State 
11. CHA - Luke Kennard, SG, Duke
12. DET - Donovan Mitchell, SG, Louisville
13. DEN - Zach Collins, PF, Gonzaga 
14. MIA - John Collins, PF, Wake Forest 
15. POR - OG Anunoby, SF, Indiana 
16. CHI - Justin Jackson, SF, UNC
17. MIL - Ike Anigbogu, C, UCLA 
18. IND - Jarrett Allen, C, Texas
19. ATL - Justin Patton, C, Creighton
20. POR - Harry Giles, PF, Duke 
21. OKC - TJ Leaf, SF, UCLA 
22. BKN - Jonathan Jeanne, C, France 
23. TOR - Terrance Ferguson, SG, Australia
24. UTA - Bam Adebayo, C, Kentucky
25. ORL - Isaiah Hartenstein, PF, Germany
26. POR - Anzejs Pasecniks, C, Latvia 
27. BKN - Semi Ojeleye, SF, SMU 
28. LAL - DJ Wilson, PF, Michigan 
29. SAS - Rodions Kurucs, SF, Latvia
30. UTA - Tyler Lydon, SF, Syracuse 

ROUND 2
31. ATL - Ivan Rabb, PF, California 
32. PHX - Tony Bradley, C, UNC
33. ORL - Derrick White, SG, Colorado 
34. SAC - Jawun Evans, PG, Oklahoma State 
35. ORL - Jordan Bell, PF, Oregon 
36. PHI - Mathias Lessort, PF, Martinique 
37. BOS - Thomas Bryant, C, Indiana 
38. CHI - Johnathan Motley, PF, Baylor 
39. PHI - Frank Jackson, PG, Duke 
40. NO - Alec Peters, PF, Valparaiso 
41. CHA - Caleb Swanigan, PF, Purdue
42. UTA - Edmond Sumner, PG, Xavier
43. HOU - Kyle Kuzma, PF, Utah
44. NYK - Josh Hart, SG, Villanova
45. HOU - Dillon Brook, SF, Oregon
46. PHI - Jonah Bolden, PF, Australia 
47. IND - Sterling Brown, SG, SMU
48. MIL - Frank Mason, PG, Kansas
49. DEN - Tyler Dorsey, SG, Oregon
50. PHI - PJ Dozier, PG, South Carolina 
51. DEN - Devin Robinson, SF, Florida 
52. WAS - Monte Morris, PG, Iowa State 
53. BOS - Cam Oliver, PF, Nevada 
54. PHX - Jaron Blossomgame, SF, Clemson 
55. UTA - Dwayne Bacon, SF, Florida State 
56. BOS - Wesley Iwundu, SG, Kansas State 
57. BKN - Sindarius Thornwell, SG, South Carolina 
58. NYK - Nigel Williams-Goss, PG, Gonzaga 
59. SAS - Kobi Simmons, PG, Arizona
60. ATL - LJ Peak, SF, Georgetown
 

Although, I do like the Swanigan pick.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to give people visual proof.

Been talking about Luke with people for the past couple of days and he's an interesting debate. There isn't any denying that Luke can shoot the ball. He's arguably the best pure shooter in the class. His question marks are how he'll be able to defend or make plays at the next level. Can he develop into a combo guard and handle the ball? I'm leaning towards no, but he did fill in at point for Duke occasionally.

My thing with Luke though mainly is his ceiling. Experts say he compares to guys like Redick and Wesley Matthews which are valuable pieces, but certainly not game changers. Again, how much of a game changer can we realistically expect at 11?

If we go Luke at 11, it will be par for the course of what Cho likes to do and that's to get a guy that can be a role player and crack Cliff's rotation much quicker than someone like Collins or French Frank would even though those guys have "higher ceilings".

From a personnel standpoint, I suppose that if Cliff's goal is to get a roster together that can legitimately help spread the floor for Kemba then it makes some sense. But in reality I'm trying to talk myself into being okay with him as the pick.

 

Luke Kennard.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AppHeel said:

Just to give people visual proof.

Been talking about Luke with people for the past couple of days and he's an interesting debate. There isn't any denying that Luke can shoot the ball. He's arguably the best pure shooter in the class. His question marks are how he'll be able to defend or make plays at the next level. Can he develop into a combo guard and handle the ball? I'm leaning towards no, but he did fill in at point for Duke occasionally.

My thing with Luke though mainly is his ceiling. Experts say he compares to guys like Redick and Wesley Matthews which are valuable pieces, but certainly not game changers. Again, how much of a game changer can we realistically expect at 11?

If we go Luke at 11, it will be par for the course of what Cho likes to do and that's to get a guy that can be a role player and crack Cliff's rotation much quicker than someone like Collins or French Frank would even though those guys have "higher ceilings".

From a personnel standpoint, I suppose that if Cliff's goal is to get a roster together that can legitimately help spread the floor for Kemba then it makes some sense. But in reality I'm trying to talk myself into being okay with him as the pick.

 

Luke Kennard.PNG

This Draft, you can get a game changer at 11.  Frank N.  And even DSJ are game changers, and he's there at 10.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Omega Atrocity said:

If the draft plays out the way that mock goes that would be fine I guess. I think Kennard will be a pretty solid NBA player, and there isn't anyone drafted after him that I love. It's a real shame Miles Bridges went back to school.

I dunno man.  Kennard is a reach at 11, honestly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Omega Atrocity said:

I understand the concerns for sure, he can't guard a paper bag, who do you like more at 11 if the draft plays out like that DE mock?

At that point, I would trade up for DSJ, or Draft Allen from Texas.  I want a high ceiling guy.  That could possibly become a monster.  If DSJ falls to 10, Jordan should trade something to get him.  Cho needs to do that ASAP.    

Edit: I know people say "if only you were out GM, bull s hit, bull s hit."  But honestly, I think all of us could've done a better job than Cho at Drafting.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reality though is that there just isn't a traditional #1 pick type of player in this draft to begin with. He might have been below Marvin last year, but I don't think he'd have been below Nabers. And if you think he disappears in some college games, then you're only looking at the box scores, I guarantee you not a single NFL GM will say he disappears in games when watching the tape. Arizona's offense is a MESS this year, the new coaching staff is beyond bad and the fanbase is screaming for them all to be fired, our OL is awful, our QB is playing like utter garbage, and we don't have another weapon to attract any defensive attention.  Teams are double and triple teaming him on almost every snap, and when combined with the OL and QB issues, it's just impossible to get him the ball sometimes.  And even when our QB forces the pass to him, half the time it's not even catchable given how poor he's been playing. And even despite all that, he's still 3rd in the nation in yards. I've also seen more WR rankings having Burden over Hunter than I have seen Hunter over T-Mac.  If we had a true outside #1 WR, then taking someone like Hunter (or Burden) instead of T-Mac would make more sense as if Hunter were to play WR in the NFL, he'd more likely be used a slot guy like Godwin or Kupp.   There's a reason most mocks/analysts who don't list Hunter as a CB/WR (or just Athlete) list him as a CB.  Because it's his better position and the side of the ball he's more likely to play in the NFL, partially due to his wire thin frame, I don't see him holding up long term as a WR.
    • This was a good breakdown from Daniels.  Last year has had a lasting impact on Young. He still isn't getting the time needed from the OL - the OL we have is made to establish the run and for the run to be in play.  We get behind and have to throw all game we are doomed with this O-line. His receivers have to catch the ball when he makes a good throw to them, he can't have them dropping his good passes. Why are we running 4 slants all toward the same direction?  Why a triple option on 4th and 1? That's on the coaches. Bryce gets hurried and starts slinging the ball where it shouldn't be thrown, more study and recognition from him are needed.  Bryce doesn't step up in the pocket and throws too soon and unbalanced.  He over and under throws the ball because of it.  That's on him.  If the pocket isn't there and he can't get his base set he needs to check down or "live to fight another day." He has been thrown to the wolves and has lost his confidence.  This team doesn't have much, if any, talent and it's a cluster.  I think he can still be an NFL QB.  Maybe not a QB1 in the short term, but if he has a chance with better coaching and personnel he may be better than we are giving him credit for. I think we ruined him last year and have not fixed anything to help him this year.  If we can't run or get way behind all NFL defenses are coming after him.  Dalton has more respect and defenses didn't always sell out to get to him because he'd hit a quick slant, screen, or check down because he has the experience to know what's coming and what to do. Just my 2 cents.
    • All depends on who the backup is. Josh Allen probably would have been benched too if there were better backups than Matt Barkley and Nate peterman.
×
×
  • Create New...