Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We Need to Draft Upside

AppHeel

By AppHeel,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

AppHeel Apprentice

AppHeel

Posted
Posted

I'm beginning to lean towards the thinking that Charlotte needs to draft a guy with higher upside potential even if the risk of being a bust is also high. That would mean taking guys like Zach Collins or Frank Ntilikina.

Collins will have a lot of detractors because he's another 7 foot white guy, but his production speaks for itself and from an advanced statistical standpoint Collins is off the charts. He projects really really high. His PER production compares similarly to what Anthony Davis, KAT, Embid, etc put up in college. You can debate the whole Collins played at Gonzaga so his stats are skewed thing, but production is production.

French Frank is 18 and plays internationally in France so there is a lot of unknown about him, but the measurables (6-5 with a 7-1 wingspan) are there and having that in a PG is pretty rare. Frank already projects as a good to great NBA defender and his play in the PnR is solid. He gets knocked as a shooter, but the guy has good form. It's not like we'd have to overhaul everything like we are doing with MKG. He also fills a position of need and may be considered an upgrade already to what we can afford in free agency. Even if he plays a lot in Greensboro early and defers backup minutes to someone like Briante Webber, Frank has a high ceiling and should be able to play alongside Kemba as he develops. His size helps with that.

The problem is, Cho has one season to save his job, so he very well may draft someone safe ala Frank Kaminsky that can crack minutes in Cliff's rotation right away. See Justin Jackson, Donovan Mitchell, Luke Kennard, etc. All 3 guys have positives and at various times I have been all for drafting 1 or 2 of these guys, but the Hornets need to take a risk to get out of the middle. They need upside. 

Give me Collins or French Frank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AppHeel Apprentice

AppHeel

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, nctarheel0619 said:

If you want upside, Harry Giles is where it's at.  If he could live up to his billing like he did last year, it could be a steal.  

Definitely can get behind the logic. For me personally, I just can't get past the multiple ACL tears. That's not to say though, that if this was the guy the FO decided to go with that I wouldn't eventually warm up to it.

If drafting Collins or Ntilikina is like trying to hit a home run in the bottom of the ninth down a run, then drafting Giles would be like trying to hit a grand slam, down 3 in the bottom of the ninth with an 0-2 count and 2 outs. 

Giles is definitely the biggest upside in the draft when it comes to players outside the top 8 or 9, but he's also the biggest risk. Would be a ballsy move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AppHeel Apprentice

AppHeel

Posted
  • Author
Posted
25 minutes ago, #PanthersKing said:

French Frank won't be there at #11 anymore. 

I do like Collins and Markannen. I prefer these two white men over Zeller

If French Frank goes before 11, then perhaps another PG like Dennis Smith will fall. That's when it gets interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, AppHeel said:

Definitely can get behind the logic. For me personally, I just can't get past the multiple ACL tears. That's not to say though, that if this was the guy the FO decided to go with that I wouldn't eventually warm up to it.

If drafting Collins or Ntilikina is like trying to hit a home run in the bottom of the ninth down a run, then drafting Giles would be like trying to hit a grand slam, down 3 in the bottom of the ninth with an 0-2 count and 2 outs. 

Giles is definitely the biggest upside in the draft when it comes to players outside the top 8 or 9, but he's also the biggest risk. Would be a ballsy move.

It would be the one time in our history we Drafted for upside, instead of instant impact.  Ballsy for sure.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AppHeel Apprentice

AppHeel

Posted
  • Author
Posted
23 minutes ago, #PanthersKing said:

Have you pay any attention to mock drafts? 

Yes and outside of Fultz, Ball, Jackson, Tatum, Fox and Monk it's up in there air. Someone will fall. Not inconceivable that if 4 point guards go in top 7 or 8, then the 5th (being Smith or Ntilikina) will drop to 11.

Draft Express has us taking Ntilikina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted

I saw at least one mock draft that had the Hornets taking Collins.  John Collins that is.  John made a tremendous leap last year.   Only real weakness is the lack of a consistent shot from more than 10 feet away from the basket.  But if he can improve in that area, could be the steal of the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rico6 Grand Master

rico6

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I saw at least one mock draft that had the Hornets taking Collins.  John Collins that is.  John made a tremendous leap last year.   Only real weakness is the lack of a consistent shot from more than 10 feet away from the basket.  But if he can improve in that area, could be the steal of the draft.

John would be a top 5 pick in 2005, in today's NBA he lacks length and offensive versatility that almost every 4/5 in the NBA offers today.

Definitely a case study for what the NBA is NOT more so than what it currently is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SuperBowlBound Community Regular

SuperBowlBound

Posted
Posted

Rich Cho isn't interested in players with superstar potential. He would rather have a team full of role players. Role player Rich is a below average GM. He's been here for six years now. The only thing the Hornets have to show for it is two first round playoff exits and no superstar.

In my eyes, Collins is the pick. As noted earlier in this thread, people will hate it because of the 7-foot white guy redundancy. He can play immediately and has the chance to be an excellent player.

However, I have zero confidence in Cho's ability to the right thing in the draft. I still do not understand why his option was picked up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Game thread

      By frankw · Posted

      Man whether it's the Panthers or the Hornets it's crazy how many foolish talking heads there are in the local media. I just unsubscribed from locked on Hornets. Doug Branson with his cheesy mustache is an absolute clown especially when his partner isn't on. Talking about trading LaMelo because he can't win basketball games by himself with no semblance whatsoever of a legitimate Center. These YouTube personalities will say anything for a damn click.
    • trucpfan
      Dream big: Imagine this future and tell me how you feel

      By trucpfan · Posted

      I’m hoping for that exact same scenario, two seconds would be big for us. I’d hope for 3 impact players. A WR/DL/DE that can contribute like this current class would be key to our rebuild.
    • outlaw4
      Forget about Bryce, Dave Canales is who we should be talking about.

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      When I look at what I can find, a carryover problem from last season is our receivers are still unable to get enough separation on a consistent basis. Canales is certainly better at scheming them open, like how he sneaked out Thielen for a big play. But then he's also having Thielen running routes he frankly shouldn't be doing anymore. I feel part of the RZ issues is not really having anyone - after trading Diontae - who can make those quick cuts on a short field to give whoever is under center a wider window to throw. We also only have one guy with blazing speed in Thompkins and from what I could see, he's really used more to draw away coverage. I bring this all up because what Canales needs for sustained success - other than QB - is the other receiver pieces we'll be getting in the offseason.  Otherwise, I have to say that Canales isn't as afraid to be aggressive offensively. As others mentioned, still doesn't run the ball enough at times. Finally, I still feel his playcalls still doesn't line up with his mantra of getting rid of the ball within x amount of seconds. Maybe I count too slow. Oh, and I'm glad Canales first game after a bye looked good. I feared he'd be like Ron Rivera where we would fall flat on our faces.
×
×
  • Create New...