Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Celebration rule changes


Recommended Posts

I want to see AB or someone else bust out a full Cheerleader routine complete with chest waggling, ass shaking, hair tossing, the works, just so I can sit back and watch the shitstorm the media will create about gender equality or whatever when it's flagged. 

Then again I love watching Goodell sweat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still miss the old NFL from like 2002-2008 when smitty, TO, and ocho cinco would try and out do each other every Sunday afternoon. Good times. The HOF jacket, the sharpie, the joe horn cell phone. smitty pretending the football was a baby. Great times were had watching NFL primetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, luke nukem said:

Still miss the old NFL from like 2002-2008 when smitty, TO, and ocho cinco would try and out do each other every Sunday afternoon. Good times. The HOF jacket, the sharpie, the joe horn cell phone. smitty pretending the football was a baby. Great times were had watching NFL primetime.

This. Most of the celebrations were just good, clean fun and added entertainment to the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rog makes it official:   (The Benjamin/Funchess dance from last season was specifically cited as something that would not be penalized).

Quote

Today, we are excited to tell you about another change that comes after conversations with more than 80 current and former players: we are relaxing our rules on celebrations to allow players more room to have fun after they make big plays. 

We know that you love the spontaneous displays of emotion that come after a spectacular touchdown. And players have told us they want more freedom to be able to express themselves and celebrate their athletic achievements. 

 

Quote

In my conversations with NFL players, it was also clear how much our players care about sportsmanship, clean competition, and setting good examples for young athletes. That is why offensive demonstrations, celebrations that are prolonged and delay the game, and those directed at an opponent, will still be penalized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...