Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox Sports says Panthers have the 24th best stadium in the NFL.


Recommended Posts

The tailgate scene in Charlotte is sort of lacking, but that's what happens when a stadium is right in the heart of downtown. And that's a compliment. Centrally located stadiums are where it's at. Eating and drinking in a climate-controlled establishment designed for such things and then walking to the stadium is far better than standing around in a parking lot convincing yourself that cooking hot dogs on a small, charcoal grill while wearing your huge winter gloves is some sort of rite of the football fan. Don't get me wrong -- some people do tailgating right. Most of them just happen to be doing it on Saturdays outside SEC stadiums.

Top 5:

5. Heinz Field (Pitt)

4. Lincoln Financial Field (Philadelphia Eagles)

3. Arrowhead Stadium (Kansas City Chiefs)

2. CenturyLink Field (Seattle Seahawks)

1. Lambeau Field (Green Bay Packers)

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/gallery/best-worst-nfl-stadiums-ranking-size-lambeau-cowboys-052217

 

@15

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Arroz con Panther said:

Also, I do wish that Charlotte tailgates started earlier, but I probably wouldn't make it into the game if I started drinking at 7.

Ummm......I don't ever remember seeing you when I get there at 7a. Or while I'm usually alone until 9a. Unless Alvarez or Brandon comes by 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean it's not even like this was his worst game of the season... I'm not done with him by any means but this feels more the norm for him than the exception:/
    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
×
×
  • Create New...