Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jake to Smitty now vs then. Why it may not be all bad.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

The Jake Delhomme-Steve Smith Connection is nearly as potent as ever. Last year the two were basically lost without one another, so this year they are making up time and Jake just can't seem to keep his eyes off of Smitty.

Like I alluded to, Jake's desire to get the ball to Smitty has been very productive this year. When looking at it from just an intellectual sense, it seems like this productivity is to the detriment of the other wide-outs. We all remember the 2005 Season when Delhomme and Smith seemed like magnets, and that got us to the brink of another Super Bowl. But it was in Seattle that Jake's undying reliance on Smitty got outed, and the Panthers were crushed in that game because of it. The impetus that lead to Jake's blinders was the fact that we had a pretty much average running game, and an obviously sub par receiving corps other than Steve Smith all season long. But, it was in Seattle that our lack of talent (including an injury to Deshaun Foster) sore out like a sore thumb against the league's top talent.

This year, Jake seems to be up to his old tricks, but the difference is that there are other options, and the very much real talent that plays alongside the Jake-Smitty connection is in fact the reason why the relationship has been so successful. Now, as opposed to a primary running back who had "fumbilitis," we have Deangelo Williams that never puts the ball on the ground, and is even a bigger threat to take it to the house each and every down. And, better still, we have a secondary back, Jonathan Stewart, who is arguably just as potent and explosive as Williams. When looked at in totality, Panthers version 2008, has three explosive game-breakers as opposed to one. Moreover, Jake's first love, Muhsin Muhammad, has returned from a long trip to the Windy City, and will no doubt play interference whenever the Jake-Smitty connection starts to get too much attention from the opposing players in the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...