Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2012

Jangler

By Jangler,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Independence Day was actually good. But unfortunately the subsequent movies are just the same damn thing with worse acting and no theme.

Yeah, it was good until the ending with that computer virus thingy, then it lost all credibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Delhomeboy Newbie

Delhomeboy

Posted
Posted

Yeah, it was good until the ending with that computer virus thingy, then it lost all credibility.

True. I liked, and still like the movie; but that was crazy.

Uploading a virus to a fuging alien computer with some pooty computer from the early 90's. :idea:

We had to beat'em some way, God damn it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
faultlessjoint Newbie

faultlessjoint

Posted
Posted

Absolutely Horrid.

95% of these type of movies are just an excuse to destroy a city via CGI.

And in this case it looks like SyFY channel made for tv movie quality Ucckkkkkkkkk

What a piece of sh*t

Never underestimate an excuse to destroy a city via CGI. It can make a movie worthwhile by itself. "Day After Tomorrow," pretty lame script and acting, awesome CG. I personally love to see state of the art CG, and from the commercial I saw it looked pretty well done.

I'm more likely to see a movie in the theaters if it has awesome visuals, sound, or 3d. If it's a funny movie or dialogue-driven movie, I'll wait to download it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Purity-Control Newbie

Purity-Control

Posted
Posted

Never underestimate an excuse to destroy a city via CGI. It can make a movie worthwhile by itself. "Day After Tomorrow," pretty lame script and acting, awesome CG. I personally love to see state of the art CG, and from the commercial I saw it looked pretty well done.

I'm more likely to see a movie in the theaters if it has awesome visuals, sound, or 3d. If it's a funny movie or dialogue-driven movie, I'll wait to download it.

I don't mind a shallow plot with cutting edge CGI either thats why i went to see the first Transformers, but I just dont see anything CGI wise in this movie that looks well done or original in fact it looks dated

Typical outrunning of some "Force" the collapsing structures and the last minute attempt to get under it.

SPI has done some good stuff in the past but it doesnt look like they put much into 2012 it looks like a cheaper version of ILM's Day After Tomorrow and that movie is 5yrs old.

Looks like a quick cash grab

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cookinwithgas Veteran

cookinwithgas

Posted
Posted

All this CGI stuff makes me yawn. Is it that the twitchy XBox kids are addicted to it or something?

I love me some Cusack but this kind of looks like an easy "pretend you are looking at the earth being blowed up!" paycheck for him.

I think I will like this more than Transformers, but Transformers sucked so much ass that that is not saying much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PadresPanthersFan
      Bears fire Matt Eberfus

      By PadresPanthersFan · Posted

      His o loaded with swift, dj, Keenan and Rome was inconsistent at best. The d was bad. And the game management was atrocious and lost them games.  He was terrible and made the team worse. I wish they kept him
    • MHS831
      High look overview...

      By MHS831 · Posted

      That is my point.  I think teams make a huge mistake when they pay their decent to average QBs top QB money because they feel that they have to match the market or lose their investment--There is no way, for example, that Tua or Prescott or Murray should all be making more than Mahomes--I mean, Dak makes $15m per season more than Mahomes. People say, "Well, when its his turn...." But that is not how it should be--so my point was that Bryce can be doing mediocre to good enough in 2 years, but the way it is going, you have to pay him at the starting QB rate--currently $60m.  So even if you think he will continue to improve, at $60 m, he would eliminate any chance for a ring---so my view is, if he is not elite, you cut him.  So you draft QBs now and see what you can make of them.
    • PappyMay
      High look overview...

      By PappyMay · Posted

      With two 4ths and three 5ths I’m hoping we can kill it on adding depth. Take a gamble with the two 7ths.  First 3 picks id love to address the defense. I expect Tuttle, Robinson, and Jewell to all be on the 2025 roster but not after that. Be a good time to add depth and let them develop a year.  
×
×
  • Create New...