Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Shula And The Panthers Planned On Getting McCaffrey And Samuel Months In Advance


Saca312

Recommended Posts

If there's any more reason to hope that Shula turns his career around, this could just be it.

Apparently, McCaffrey and Samuel were part of the plans for months. Shula, Rivera, and coaches have been studying their film extensively months prior to the draft, figuring out creative ways they could be used. This was not a combo just bunched up overnight, as is revealed.

http://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2017/05/15/monday-morning-blues-let-cam-newton-be-cam-newton/

Quote

Offensive coordinator Mike Shula finally defines “evolution”

Ever since coach Ron Rivera mentioned in a press conference that the Carolina offense needed to “evolve,” Panthers fans has been waiting with bated breath.

What does it mean?

With free agency coming and going without a single hint, Panthers fans were left guessing.

Fast forward to the 2017 NFL draft, where general manager Dave Gettleman engineered the selections of not one, but two offensive weapons that can moonlight at running back and wide receiver in Christian McCaffrey and Curtis Samuel.

Not long after, Albert Breer’s interview with Mike Shula finally shed light and defined the “evolution,” once and for all.

"Over the past couple months, Shula and his coaches ramped up their study of college offenses, including the ones Samuel and McCaffrey played (and others like Texas Tech and Virginia Tech) to find ways to build on a scheme that already carries perhaps the NFL’s most complex run game. Part of it was in evaluating players like McCaffrey and Samuel. But another was figuring out how they’d use them."

It is fascinating that the Panthers braintrust put in months into the decision to draft McCaffrey and Samuel. While some (myself included) thought the pick was the result of having McCaffrey’s running backs coach at Stanford now on staff in Carolina, it was actually more methodical than that. This is deep.

"It’s why the Panthers probably would’ve taken McCaffrey, even if Leonard Fournette had fallen to them, and it’s why they double-downed by taking another Swiss Army knife in the second round. It evolved like this: The more they looked for ways to use Newton, the more they saw how versatile weapons from spread schools would fit, and it became apparent how dangerous Carolina could be with all of it put together."

Carolina’s front office and coaches first understood that the foundation of the offense is Newton. Once they figure that piece out, they put in hours of film study to figure out what the best weapons were to surround their quarterback.

I have even more respect and appreciation for Gettleman, Rivera, Shula and the whole team that helped bring McCaffrey and Samuel to Carolina. This was an intelligent and intricate plan to put Newton in the best position succeed after pouring through hours and days of film study.

This means they finally realized that he is much more successful with receivers that can separate and win early, so they do not have to win late. They realized that he is better with deception and creating mismatches, instead of just getting the biggest and baddest skill players possible.

Very eye opening. One of the biggest gripes that put a downer on the potential of McCaffrey and Samuel was the fact that "Shula wouldn't know how to use them."

Well looks like they were already planning extensively for months on how exactly they would.

Do you have hope that these extra months of study and planning could produce fruitful results on the field? Discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Fair enough. I never once said not supporting Tepper makes you a bad fan by the way. I can't stand the guy myself. You on the other hand don't like anything about the team. You can't stand the owner or the coach because his religion doesn't fall in line with how you feel it should so I'm curious why you are even a fan at this point? Hell, you like nothing about the team, why even be a fan these days?  We can go backs and forth about how many games we have been to and measure dicks if you want or but it doesn't matter. I've been to my fair share over the years. Some as a fan and some work related but I bet you have been to more due to my weekends being filled with some work I do at the collegiate level so I probably only average maybe 2-3 games per year tops. You have me beat there im sure. You are probably very correct on us not being the same in anything at all I am quite sure of that. If I'm a "mark" (as you put it) for not liking Tepper and not caring about Canales religion or his political beliefs or letting it have weight on whether or not I like the team then call me a "mark" but you're still a whiny bitch either way.  When you hate everything about leadership from their personalities to their religious beliefs all the way to who they vote for at that point why even be a fan? I can side with you judging by your beliefs that you have made apparent, if you owned and coached the team, I sure as hell would find a new one to support but as you said we are different. Enjoy Norway, it is a beautiful country. Visited last year myself and absolutely loved it.
    • The playing well part, depends on what happens going forward. It could have been a tease that will dig our hole deeper.  In the small picture of one game, probably his best game. Green Bay wasn't as great as people think it was. More like one good quarter. Followed by two games of exactly nothing. 
    • Oh, it was handled horrifically.  Ego got in the way of a plan.  I'm just saying, that he actually probably stumbled into the better outcome/plan.  
×
×
  • Create New...