Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rank the five best teams in Hornets history


Recommended Posts

1. 1997-98: Didn't win as many games as the '96-97 team but was far better positioned to compete for a championship. This squad had what you need to win a title (sharpshooting SF as alpha-dog, bruising C and PF combo in their prime, potent scoring bench with Curry and B.J., good coaching with Cowens). Had the Bulls not been there, we'd have been facing the Jazz for all the marbles

2. 1992-93: Our only Big Three (LJ, 'Zo, Muggsy) with Kendall Gill and Curry too. This team had the most individual talent but had a weak-ass bench

3. 2015-16: Top to bottom, the second-most talented roster we've ever fielded. Kemba, Nic, Al and Lin could theoretically take over games. Cody had come into his own and as a playoff team, we were dangerous with Kemba and Lin scoring at will. Also lost a tiebreaker for the division title

4. 1996-97: Best individual season by a Hornet (Glen Rice) but got swept in the playoffs by the damn Knicks. 

5: 2000-01: Closest we've ever come to the Conference Finals with a roster of above-average guys and role players who overachieved like crazy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to include the Bobcats.  I would say the 2010 Bobcats crack that list.  They are my favorite Charlotte basketball roster ever.  Also my favorite Charlotte uniforms ever.

PG: Raymond Felton / DJ Augustin

SG: Stephen Jackson / Gerald Henderson

SF: Gerald Wallace 

PF: Boris Diaw / Tyrus Thomas

C: Tyson Chandler / Nazr Mohammed / Theo Ratliff

Raymond+Felton+Orlando+Magic+v+Charlotte

Stephen-Jackson-1-27-10.jpg

Gerald-Wallace-San-Antonio-Spurs-v-Charl

boris-diaw.jpg

1atysonap.standalone.prod_affiliate.117.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL that Bobcats team where Chandler didn't even play in the playoffs (and really didn't try during regular season either).   Ratliff was starting in the playoffs for us if I remember lol.

Wallace and Jack was always fun to watch though.   Looking back, if we got full effort from Tyson and Diaw that year, we would have had a nastier team.   Tyrus came on like a beast and then was terrible after the signing, so weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly the type of thing he would have done here. The excuse people were stannin’ so hard claiming he would have looked just as bad. Just not true. 
    • Yes and there aren't 32 starting QBs in the league either. Too many teams and too many games. The NFL has regressed over the years and game quality is lacking. The other leagues are supposed to be farm leagues but it doesn't matter. You just won't have 32 no matter what they do. The move to super athletes playing QB at all levels has lead to this. It used to be those guys played other positions but now they are QBs who can't really QB.  It has a trickle down effect too. OL can't block because they never had to. The fact that in today's game your QB must be able to run at least a little to survive is evidence of this as well. IMO they have ruined the game same as with the NBA. It's been simplified to the point of being boring.  Just look at the top 10 this season. Patrick Mahomes (Chiefs) Joe Burrow (Bengals) Josh Allen (Bills) Lamar Jackson (Ravens) Dak Prescott (Cowboys) Jalen Hurts (Eagles) Brock Purdy (49ers) Jordan Love (Packers) Justin Herbert (Chargers) Matthew Stafford (Rams) Once we get to number 5 the stats look like this: 167 262 1,845 63.7 7.0 10 8 65 18 84.5   47.5   10 TDs and 8 INTs??? At number 5??? There was a time not that long ago that he wouldn't even be a starter.   
    • I'm not convinced that the NFL is any better or worse at developing QBs now than they were 20 years ago.  I mean I'm sure there are some developmental issues at play, just not sure it is any different than it has been. The biggest difference IMO is that NFL teams are waaaaaaaay more willing to invest a 1st round pick into a QB now than they were 15-20 years ago.  A guy like Colin Kaepernick would probably be a top 5 pick in 2025, whereas he went in the 2nd in 2011.  Would a guy like Trey Lance go top 3 in 2010?  Hell no.  Look at Russell Wilson - he didn't go until the 3rd round.  The standard for being a 1st round QB has dropped. So it may seem like we're seeing more high-profile busts at the position, but we're also seeing teams reach for QBs way more than they have in the past.  Someone with Anthony Richardson's college resume doesn't go in the top 3 20 years ago.  
×
×
  • Create New...