Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

There Is Offset Language In Christian McCaffrey's 4 Year Deal


Recommended Posts

Bosa was arguing against two items, not just offset language.
1) Offset language
2) Signing bonus derferment.
Chargers were asking him to agree to both, Offset language and signing bonus deferment.  Most top 10 pick contracts only have one or the other.

You are right and it was the deferred signing bonus which was the real issue. I doubt the offset language was the reason for the hold out.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I love CMC's confidence that it doesn't matter because it'll never come into play. I dislike the lack of confidence that we're showing in the guy we just spent the #8 overall pick on. You picked the kid. You believe in the kid. Put your money where your mouth is and give the kid his money guaranteed.

It's just business.  Has nothing to do with "lack of confidence".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Worm said:

It's just business.  Has nothing to do with "lack of confidence".

It has everything to do with lack of confidence. If you're confident in your investment, you don't need to hedge against it.

"It's just business" is a cop out. Of course it's business, it's a contract. It would've also been "just business" had CMC told Dave to go get bent and refused to sign a contract with offset language. But, CMC had the bigger balls and signed it anyway. I was a little torn on the kid at #8, but I'm all in now. He's gonna ball out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

It's really not. Bosa sat out for weeks because of the language.

 

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It has everything to do with lack of confidence. If you're confident in your investment, you don't need to hedge against it.

"It's just business" is a cop out. Of course it's business, it's a contract. It would've also been "just business" had CMC told Dave to go get bent and refused to sign a contract with offset language. But, CMC had the bigger balls and signed it anyway. I was a little torn on the kid at #8, but I'm all in now. He's gonna ball out.

The fact of the matter is that as an organization, as a business, if you can get language like this in a contract you do it.  Doesn't matter who the player is.  If you think the other party will accept language in a contract that protects YOU, you do it.  It is not one bit related to how you view them as a player.  If they weren't "confident in their investment" they wouldn't have taken the kid at #8.  Period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Worm said:

 

The fact of the matter is that as an organization, as a business, if you can get language like this in a contract you do it.  Doesn't matter who the player is.  If you think the other party will accept language in a contract that protects YOU, you do it.  It is not one bit related to how you view them as a player.  If they weren't "confident in their investment" they wouldn't have taken the kid at #8.  Period.

You're still stuck in this "it's just business" mindset.

If you're confident in your investment, why do you need the offset language? Take "it's just business" off the table. The only real answer is to protect yourself against a poor pick.

I agree with you that if you can get the player to sign it without hassle then there's no reason not to, but I wouldn't have blamed CMC one bit if he refused to sign it. It's not accurate to say "it's just business" and act like this is commonplace for top 10 draft picks because it's not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The language is pretty common on the first round of negotiations.  If they take it, great.  If not, they go on to round two.  Pretty common path for how a negotiation takes.  I'd be willing to bet they've put it out for every pick, but Luke and Cam had to negotiate it away.  No big deal.  I'd low ball my brother if it saved me money.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You're still stuck in this "it's just business" mindset.

If you're confident in your investment, why do you need the offset language? Take "it's just business" off the table. The only real answer is to protect yourself against a poor pick.

I agree with you that if you can get the player to sign it without hassle then there's no reason not to, but I wouldn't have blamed CMC one bit if he refused to sign it. It's not accurate to say "it's just business" and act like this is commonplace for top 10 draft picks because it's not.

Anyone can be a bust.  Anyone can be a poor pick.  If you can protect yourself against that you do.

It's not specific to CMC at all.  They showed confidence by taking him at 8, that's it, that's all.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Worm said:

Anyone can be a bust.  Anyone can be a poor pick.  If you can protect yourself against that you do.

It's not specific to CMC at all.  They showed confidence by taking him at 8, that's it, that's all.

 

Hey man, I have a job I want to hire you to do. I have full confidence in the world in you to get it done, but if for whatever reason I decide to change course, you're going to have to pay me back the remainder of the money out of your next job's paycheck. We good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...