Carolina Panthers claim Defensive End off waivers

[heel31ok]

9 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Aww. I think I have an admirer. An old admirer with poo for football knowledge, but an admirer nonetheless

coming from the king of poo talk and no football  ...I admire how you BS your way through this forum...but I'll be there for you...friends?

[csx]

I wouldn't describe our DE situation as thin. There are 4 veterans ahead of him and a draft pick. 

[Bartin]

Can't imagine he is anything but camp fodder

[Jeremy Igo]

I wouldn't describe our DE situation as thin. There are 4 veterans ahead of him and a draft pick. 

Was a weak link last year.

Has only gotten older.

[csx]

Just now, Jeremy Igo said:

 

Was a weak link last year.

Has only gotten older.

 

I guess we have different definitions of thin. He's not got much chance of displacing anyone regardless of their age 

[TheSpecialJuan]

16 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

 

 

Was a weak link last year.

Has only gotten older.

 

Older yes, but also better.

[Jeremy Igo]

I guess we have different definitions of thin. He's not got much chance of displacing anyone regardless of their age 

More of a chance than most teams.

[heel31ok]

33 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Can't imagine he is anything but camp fodder

I can imagine 6'6" 280 as a little more than that...definitely worth a look...

[The Huddler]

5 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

 

More of a chance than most teams.

 

Totally gunna cut JP or CJ for this guy

 

totally 

[KillerKat]

He'd have to beat out Horton if we carry 5 DEs

[jayflip]

50 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

coming from the king of poo talk and no football  ...I admire how you BS your way through this forum...but I'll be there for you...friends?

Your pie to post ratio is the worst I've seen on this board, except for that guy who still somehow has negative pie. 

And before you talk about "I don't care about pie on an internet message board, blah blah blah" ... it's still a pretty good indicator of the quality of your posts when you get to a certain post threshold. 

[uncfan888]

2 minutes ago, jayflip said:

Your pie to post ratio is the worst I've seen on this board, except for that guy who still somehow has negative pie. 

And before you talk about "I don't care about pie on an internet message board, blah blah blah" ... it's still a pretty good indicator of the quality of your posts when you get to a certain post threshold. 

It really is so, so bad. But if you look back at his posts, that terrible reputation is earned

[KillerKat]

Are we really comparing pie to post ratio now? L-M-M'F-A-OOOOOOO

[uncfan888]

No one is comparing anything. Reading comprehension would help. Flip simply stated that a terrible pie count is a good indicator of the quality of posts someone makes. Which is true