Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which Analyst Was The Most Accurate


RumHam

Recommended Posts

This is why mock drafts are stupid (and why the serious analysts like Mayock only do them to appease viewers) because it's almost impossible to guess what each GM is going to do and to pick out all the trades. 

How a rational human being should judge these analysts is were they right about the studs and the duds three years from now. This is why I am indifferent about Christian. I didn't waste my time watching hours of tape, but I trust that DG did. If he's Christian ends up being the player we want him to be, then that's success. If mayock and others saw him having success in the next level then that's success. If analysts don't think Trubisky will have success and he does, then that's failure on part of the analysts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I want to know, because they are a waste and people take them too seriously. Kiper sat there in disgust last night not talking because he wasn't remotely close. He put a Linebacker with shoulder issues at #5. Anyone can be "opinionated" but it would help if someone was credible. I almost think the teams do this on purpose now despite the media. When they all talked about Chicago taking Solomon Thomas at #2, every casual knew it was for a QB. People just couldn't believe it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, RumHam said:

Kiper missed on like 75% of his picks. He seriously doesn't deserve a job. Anyways, who or where seemed to be the most accurate in the first round?

If he hit on 25% that would make him the most accurate. I think I read mayock only hit on 2 players. Garrett and McCaffrey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, RumHam said:

Kiper missed on like 75% of his picks. He seriously doesn't deserve a job. Anyways, who or where seemed to be the most accurate in the first round?

First time watching the draft eh? he misses on like 75% every year, he knows a lot about every player and thats why he is who he is, not for getting the picks right cause he never does

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

For those saying Mayock, Mayock is actually one of the worse mock draft analyst out there. Kiper is actually more accurate 

Actually untrue. Until this year, when everyone struggled, Mayock was top 5 in Mock Draft accuracy. Jason Boris, the 2nd most accurate mock drafter, until this year, only got 3 right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mocks are fun, but expecting them to actually be accurate is an exercise in futility. Just far too many variables with hundreds of prospects, different opinions within the same room (scout opinions vary a lot compared to media groupthink), trades, positional value assessments, etc. Getting the exact slot for 32 players correct is akin to getting 100% on your March Madness bracket.

But to answer your question: the top media guy from the first round was Marino from NDT, who got only 9 picks "right." That's 72% wrong, so there's only a 3% gap (or one correct pick) between the top guy and "how does this guy have a job?"

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For the silly people that worship her it will be that.  The Coleman 'legend' thing, they did that with another fairly average player that was here and I sort of mocked or questioned the 'legend' status. Instantly caught crap for insulting someone's favorite Panther. So okay, Kurt Coleman is a Legend. 
    • You allow him to compete--you all are talking as if I am proposing making him the starter. Give him a new coach, new weapons, good OL, etc. and see what happens. You are saying, "Well Damn.  It did not work for 3 guys..."  Right now, our C is injured, we lost our top 2 WRs.  Better question:  If you need a QB, Why would you not take a chance on bringing in a QB who was a former first rounder, a good arm, intelligence, mobility, youth, etc.  and see how he does out of NY--with a better OL, better running game, better receivers.  I am not saying give him a 10-year contract, I am saying give him a chance. You act like there is no improvement on offense here--it was a 2 year process, and next year is year 2.  To me, how can you sit there with Bryce and an opportunity to sign a veteran QB on the cheap comes available and you say--"Not us. We're good.  We are waiting for Patrick Mahommes."  Jone's problem is obviously mental--and he has little support.  Why is this so frigging hard to comprehend.  It is called "bottom fishing" and it is better than sitting in the boat.  
    • I think we're going to fall from behind quite early and be forced to abandon the run game.  3 rushes -2 yards 1 catch -10 yards 
×
×
  • Create New...