Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In the first round of the 2017 NFL Draft , The Carolina Panthers select Christian McCaffrey


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

This is a terrible pick, IMO. McCaffrey is a 2nd round pick at best, not a feature back, and his absolute highest ceiling is Sproles. 

I hate this pick, it just strikes me as Shaq Thompson-esque, except on the offensive side of things. 

Hope to God I'm wrong, but I would far rather have had Barnett or Lattimore or even Howard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Thanatos said:

This is a terrible pick, IMO. McCaffrey is a 2nd round pick at best, not a feature back, and his absolute highest ceiling is Sproles. 

I hate this pick, it just strikes me as Shaq Thompson-esque, except on the offensive side of things. 

Hope to God I'm wrong, but I would far rather have had Barnett or Lattimore or even Howard.

Shaq isn't bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KillerKat said:

Shaq isn't bad?

No he isn't, and that's kinda my point. I don't think McCaff is bad, I just see a handful of players I wished we would have taken ahead of him. I don't think he's going to horribly bust, I just don't see him as worth a #8 pick. Bottom of the 1st to Middle of the 2nd is where I had him.

The comparison is more of the swiss army knife thing. Shaq was a S/LB hybrid, McCaff is a WR/RB hybrid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a terrible pick, IMO. McCaffrey is a 2nd round pick at best, not a feature back, and his absolute highest ceiling is Sproles. 
I hate this pick, it just strikes me as Shaq Thompson-esque, except on the offensive side of things. 
Hope to God I'm wrong, but I would far rather have had Barnett or Lattimore or even Howard.

100000% agree

Trade to swap with old arse Coughlin.... gawdaummit

2fd8249a7b25531bf2f8a96614f88b59.jpg

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Took me a bit, as I was watching the NFLN coverage, but switched over to ESPN's to check their coverage of our pick and they actually interviewed CM.  I was excited just watching it.  He was so giddy to be picked by us, was smiling the entire time, and he said all of the right things...  also like that Mayock pointed out that he thinks CM is a more athletic LeSean McCoy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

Took me a bit, as I was watching the NFLN coverage, but switched over to ESPN's to check their coverage of our pick and they actually interviewed CM.  I was excited just watching it.  He was so giddy to be picked by us, was smiling the entire time, and he said all of the right things...  also like that Mayock pointed out that he thinks CM is a more athletic LeSean McCoy.

God, I just hate our OC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

Shaq is a stud. 

Only issue for Shaq is Thomas Davis is a bigger one.  Davis literally has played his best ball the past couple seasons 

Landon Collins was on the board when we took Shaq. So was Damarious Randall. If you don't think having a stud safety outweighs what Shaq brings, idk man. 

Again, neither Shaq or McCaff is bad, IMO. Just there were better players available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Thanatos said:

Landon Collins was on the board when we took Shaq. So was Damarious Randall. If you don't think having a stud safety outweighs what Shaq brings, idk man. 

Again, neither Shaq or McCaff is bad, IMO. Just there were better players available.

I didn't say that.  I haven't been a supporter of Dave's habit of drafting guys like Butler and Shaq that get stuck from day 1 in backup roles because of talent ahead of them.  

but Shaq is a young stud is all I am saying.  TD has just been a beast of late.  Can't really take TD and Luke off the field 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would argue this has literally always been the case for almost the entire existence of the NFL. There are substantially more busts than hits, across all rounds. I would say also that there doesn't appear to be much evidence for college quarterbacks being less prepared than before. Certainly in some cases they are vastly underprepared but that has always been the case.  I would definitely make the argument that in every single major sport that athletes are VASTLY more experienced than 20, 30 and more years ago. A lot of that is due to earlier specialization in sport(versus just playing all the sports from K-12), DRAMATICALLY more reps and practice(travel ball, summer leagues, etc) and far greater access to specialized training(most high end players/prospects have specific trainers even before college). All of these things were not readily available decades ago. So the theoretical "10,000 reps" are being hit far, far sooner for most younger athletes. As for the argument for "gimmick offenses" being a problem. I mean....think about how prevalent things like the triple option were in the 70's, 80's and even 90's. Or just offenses in general that were absolutely extinct at the NFL level.  I think there are some general issues with certain positions and the development cycles in college but overall, the development in college has actually improved tremendously. The thing is, it's never going to improve enough to where you are just getting insanely high hit rates on prospects or large percentages of draft picks immediately playing like 8 year veterans. It will never really work like that.
    • Yeah sure some teams are not gonna want to have to recruit a QB like its college BUT you got add in desperation. One team WILL fall in love and go after him. A HC or GM on the hot seat will look past deion and draft him. 
    • The merchandise sales are such an infinitesimally small portion of NFL revenue as to be completely laughable. The NFL is as prone to wanting big market teams or traditional powers to succeed as any other major professional sport in the country. I don't really think there is a lot of evidence of "team bias" as much as there is ample evidence of "star player bias." The NFL has suffered from that for decades. It's also not as prevalent as it is in the NBA, which is just transparently tilted towards the star players. Overall, this season the refs have stood out more for their general incompetence rather than anything fishy. Still not as bad as some referees in professional sports(but MILES better than the glorified rec. refs that are in college sports). There does appear to be a general decline in the NFL refs this season. Haven't paid enough attention to see if it is certain crews or not.
×
×
  • Create New...