Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DG Smokescreen vs. Lynch Smokescreens?


t96

Is DG's one smokescreen better than Lynch's hundreds?  

13 members have voted

  1. 1. DG or Lynch



Recommended Posts

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/04/27/mccaffreys-likely-window-no-5-to-no-15/

 

Quote

As the draft has approached, a popular theory has emerged linking running back Christian McCaffrey to the Panthers at No. 8. (Indeed, that’s where he resides in the 2017 PFT Worst Mock Draft Ever.)

A source with knowledge of the dynamics believes the McCaffrey chatter is likely a smokescreen, one of the many that are wafting through the air like whatever Phil Simms pushed in the direction of Jim Nantz.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thomas96 said:

FWIW I just did the NFL Predict the Pick thing and I ended up having McCaffrey going to Washington at #17.

If all the smoke clears and everyone stays in the same spot they are in (no trades) I could see us getting Fournette and McCaffrey falling to mid-late first.

CLE - Trubisky

SF - Adams

CHI - Thomas

JAX - Allen

TEN - Lattimore

NYJ - Watson

LAC - Garrett (omg him and Bosa)

CAR - Fournette

CIN - Foster

BUF - Hooker

NO - Humphrey

CLE - Reddick

AZ - Mahomes

PHI - Charlton

IND - Barnett

BAL - Howard

WASH - McCaffrey

TEN - Williams

TB - Cook

DEN - Ramczyk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, d-dave said:

One smoke screen gives just enough to make guys think and over think.  You put out too much BS, people easily figure out you're BSing and your smoke screens lose all of their deceptive value.

Unless the truth is in one of the 10 smokescreens..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bronn said:

FWIW I just did the NFL Predict the Pick thing and I ended up having McCaffrey going to Washington at #17.

If all the smoke clears and everyone stays in the same spot they are in (no trades) I could see us getting Fournette and McCaffrey falling to mid-late first.

CLE - Trubisky

SF - Adams

CHI - Thomas

JAX - Allen

TEN - Lattimore

NYJ - Watson

LAC - Garrett (omg him and Bosa)

CAR - Fournette

CIN - Foster

BUF - Hooker

NO - Humphrey

CLE - Reddick

AZ - Mahomes

PHI - Charlton

IND - Barnett

BAL - Howard

WASH - McCaffrey

TEN - Williams

TB - Cook

DEN - Ramczyk

I believe Solomon or Hooker will be there when we pick.  OJ Howard, and McCafferey will also be on the board, but we'd be silly not to take Solomon or Hooker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lout said:

Unless the truth is in one of the 10 smokescreens..

So if someone tells me 10 concerts they've been to, but one is a lie, do try to guess which one?  Or do I just unfriend those stupid a-holes? =)  (facebook poo).

Lie all you want, it only makes any statements of truth more like a lie.  Instead, you have to look at what benefits the liar the most: in this case, SF wants to trade down and get more picks.  Deep draft, lots of talent, more picks = brighter future.

What better way to drum up interest than to spread the rumors that you're going to draft or deal all the marquee players?  That works in a 4th grade trading card swap, but I could care less.  It just means what you have to offer is less desirable than me staying pat if you're that desperate to get out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...