Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My top 33. For fun, discussion, and to pass the time.


Recommended Posts

These are my top 33 prospects. the draft is tomorrow and I wanted a place to sit down and type out my "big board."  If this doesn't interest you, feel free to hit back and move on to something else. Just killing time.  Anyway, feel free to argue.  I am no expert. 
 

Tier 1: These are the transcendent talents in the draft.  Players that could change the direction of a franchise.  If any of these 3 players are on the board when we pick, IMHO they would be a no-brainer selection.  Some would even argue they are worth trading up for. 

Myles Garrett - DE 

Jamal Adams - SS

Leonard Fournette - RB

Tier 2: This is the all-star tier.  These are likely pro-bowl caliber players who should come in and start day-1.  Due to our draft position, it is a guarantee that at least one of the players in the top 2 tiers will be available when we pick.  Depending on how many QBs or reaches occur in the top 7, we may have our choice between 2 or 3 of these players (and allow us to trade down and still get one)

Solomon Thomas - DE/DT

O.J. Howard - TE

Christian McCaffrey - RB/WR

Reuben Foster - MLB

Malik Hooker - FS


Tier 3: 

Jonathan Allen - DT/DE

Marshon Lattimore - CB

Mike Williams - WR

Corey Davis - WR

Haason Reddick - OLB
 

Tier 4: Because the draft is crazy, this is the tier we could see players start to slip and anyone beyond this point may be a target for us to trade back into the 1st round and grab. 

Dalvin Cook - RB

Derek Barnett - DE

Gareon Conley - CB

Quincy Wilson - CB

Charles Harris - DE

 

Tier 5: 

Joe Mixon - RB

Forrest Lamp - OG

Garrett Bolles - OT

John Ross - WR

David Njoku - TE

 

Tier 6: Due to teams overdrafting and QBs and other schema specific players being taken by other teams, these are the players who very well may make it to our pick in the second round.  

Ryan Ramczyk - OT

Taco Charlton - DE

Tyus Bowser - OLB

Cam Robinson - OT/OG

Alvin Kamara - RB

 

Tier 7: 

Budda Baker - FS

Takkarist McKinley - DE

Jabrill Peppers - SS

Kevin King - CB

Jarrad Davis - OLB
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lattimore and Allen should be above all in tier 2 except Thomas, who's close. Allen maybe a bit further down our board because we're set at the position but Lattimore is a legitimate top tier prospect, as are Thomas and Allen. I'd put Barnett higher and Cook lower. And don't see any way Ramczyk falls to 40, possible he goes top 15. Limited experience but was a beast last year and has what you want at OT. Peppers is an interesting prospect, would probably put him higher but he may fall now because of the diluted test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Lattimore and Allen should be above all in tier 2 except Thomas, who's close. Allen maybe a bit further down our board because we're set at the position but Lattimore is a legitimate top tier prospect, as are Thomas and Allen. I'd put Barnett higher and Cook lower. And don't see any way Ramczyk falls to 40, possible he goes top 15. Limited experience but was a beast last year and has what you want at OT. Peppers is an interesting prospect, would probably put him higher but he may fall now because of the diluted test.

From what I have heard about Allen, his shoulders are turning a lot of teams off.  Heard one scout say a team would be lucky to get a productive 4 years out of him.  I hate that, and hope it isn't true, but it bumps him down a touch IMO.  

I have never been a Barnett fan.  Maybe I am jaded because he was mocked to us so much early in this process and I thought there were better options.

Cook has horrible measurables, but you can't deny that on-field production.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Leeroy Jenkins PhD said:

From what I have heard about Allen, his shoulders are turning a lot of teams off.  Heard one scout say a team would be lucky to get a productive 4 years out of him.  I hate that, and hope it isn't true, but it bumps him down a touch IMO.  

I have never been a Barnett fan.  Maybe I am jaded because he was mocked to us so much early in this process and I thought there were better options.

Cook has horrible measurables, but you can't deny that on-field production.  

It's Cook's off-field issues that drop him down, not his on the field production, which I agree is very good. 

I think the stuff on Allen is overblown, but who knows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...