NFL Draft Rumor: Scout Insider Says Carolina Likely To Pull Trigger If Fournette Falls To #6; Other Draft Rumors

[Fournettecation]

1 minute ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

The Bengals don't need Fournette.  They have two really good backs in their backfield. They need defensive help, maybe even offense. Besides AJ Green, who else do they have? They need to take Williams or Davis. Not Fournette.  Even if they leap frog us, that's fine. He'll be in the AFC.  I wouldn't want him in the NFC. Much less in the division. I see no problem in that. That means some other really good player will fall to us without having to spend draft picks. 

Gio tore his ACL so he's a question mark until he does something positive and even before injury he wasn't all that. Jeremy Hill isn't all that. Bengals would definitely like Fournette.

[Ivan The Awesome]

7 minutes ago, Fournettecation said:

Gio tore his ACL so he's a question mark until he does something positive and even before injury he wasn't all that. Jeremy Hill isn't all that. Bengals would definitely like Fournette.

Which is fine. We're not meeting them in the Super Bowl anytime soon. They have more holes to fill than us. Let them trade the farm to leap frog us. Keeps Fournette out of our conference and most importantly out of the division. 

[Fournettecation]

TRADE: For Fournette

Round 1, Pick 8

Round 2, Pick 40

Round 2, Pick 64 (from New England)

STILL HAVE AFTER TRADE: 

Round 3, Pick 98 (compensatory pick)

Round 4, Pick 115

Round 5, Pick 152

Round 6, Pick 192

Round 7, Pick 233 (from Indianapolis through Cleveland)

 

SO WE CAN TRADE UP AND STILL HAVE MANY PICKS LEFT IN A DEEP DRAFT IF ITS SO DEEP GETTLEMAN IN DRAFTS NOT AS DEEP IN THE PAST STILL FOUND LATE ROUND GEMS SO WHY IN A DEEP DRAFT WOULDNT HE FIND LATE ROUND UDFA GEMS

 

[Fournettecation]

Losing these second round picks isn't that big of a deal when your GM finds players who are better than drafted 2nd rounders as UDFA's or 5th 6th 7th rounders

[Fournettecation]

Gettlemans 5th, 6th and 7th round picks and UDFA signings are better than some GM's 2nd round picks, or 1st round picks

[steven8989]

Fournette and Adams are going in the top 5

So u want him and saying he will got top 5. So that's saying we are not getting him because we are not trading up.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

[Fournettecation]

Just now, steven8989 said:

So u want him and saying he will got top 5. So that's saying we are not getting him because we are not trading up.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

Yeah we're trading up.

Our first and two seconds traded away still leaves us with hella picks in a hella deep draft so why the fug wouldnt we still get good players

[Saca312]

12 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Which is fine. We're not meeting them in the Super Bowl anytime soon. They have more holes to fill than us. Let them trade the farm to leap frog us. Keeps Fournette out of our conference and most importantly out of the division. 

Yeah I didn't get that as a possibility either, yet the Bengals really like Fournette. Rumors and snippings I'm hearing is that the Panthers and Bengals are in a tight race for him right now.

[Fournettecation]

Oh my in such a deep draft I don't wanna trade up

Like we need to trade every pick for Fournette. No.

We will still have plenty of picks for Gman to hit later round home runs like he always does.

[Fournettecation]

1 minute ago, thebigcat said:

This is the highest Gettleman has ever picked with the Panthers. Based on his previous first round picks, picking 8 is a serious luxury for him


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Exactly. When he's this close to a player he really wants you think if Fournette is #1 on his board and Gettleman has #8 he's going to let Fournette go at 3, 4 or 5? just before our pick ? no he's going to say Im already this high in the order might as well trade up a little farther to get the guy i really want

[Fournettecation]

3 minutes ago, steven8989 said:

So u want him and saying he will got top 5. So that's saying we are not getting him because we are not trading up.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

I want your ignorant *** to not post again when we trade up, got it?

[tiger7_88]

43 minutes ago, Fournettecation said:

Your not that smart.

Heh.

[JawnyBlaze]

If we're only trading up two spots it won't be that expensive. At most it'd cost #40. Maybe just 64 and a late round pick. 

[tiger7_88]

1 minute ago, JawnyBlaze said:

If we're only trading up two spots it won't be that expensive. At most it'd cost #40. Maybe just 64 and a late round pick. 

True, unless there is another team that wants to trade up to that spot to do the same thing, then there becomes a bidding war.