The Next Head Coach

[Cat'sGrowl]

[Samuel L. Jackson]

It WAS what we thought it was!

[Cat'sGrowl]

It WAS what we thought it was!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_N1OjGhIFc

[rayzor]

:willy_nilly:

[Bruce]

I'm gonna go off topic here but I feel it's necessary to acknowledge Bj-monster for being a new member that actually searched the thread history to make his first post in an old but relevant thread rather than starting a new one. May you lead all other new members with your glorious example-setting technique.

......and with a move like that one might wonder who he really is......

[jramsey4]

I still 2nd this motion. The guy turned stanford into a great team. Stanford for crying out loud.

[Bj-monster56]

Jim Harbaugh Is a good coach..But i think carolina will want somebody who is in the pro coaching ranks.Who Ever it is i believe they will be a defensive coach...And with people saying who carolina will pick in the draft.It depends on who the coach will be..Bet yo Money.4 example if he is a offensive coach he will go offense and a defensive coach will go defense.

[Mr. Scot]

Amuses me that this thread was actually started last year

Went a long time with no activity before someone bumped it, but then I guess it's a more relevant discussion than ever right now. Might need to update the initial posts at some point.

I wonder what the record is for longest gap between a thread's start date and last post :sosp:

[spartan_pantherfan]

I do not buy the " no retread has won with 2 teams " stat/saying.

IMO that is useless stat, winning a super bowl means things have to come together just right for the team ( see 07 Giants for the best recent example ), and it just has not happened twice for the same coach yet, does not mean it cannot or will not happen. Just getting to the super bowl is something most head coaches will not experience once, let alone twice. I don't know it just irks me for some reason ( nothing personal Mr.Scot )

[mav1234]

Amuses me that this thread was actually started last year

Went a long time with no activity before someone bumped it, but then I guess it's a more relevant discussion than ever right now. Might need to update the initial posts at some point.

I wonder what the record is for longest gap between a thread's start date and last post :sosp:

I read most threads you start because of how insightful they tend to be. So, imagine my surprise when I read the first post - without realizing it's posting date - and saw some things that didn't make a lot of sense in your coaching evals >.> Then I saw the date and it became clear!

A lot of it is still relevant today! I would love to see the first post updated, as I think you have the right idea with the setup, and I'd love to see more of your input on the subject.

I do not buy the " no retread has won with 2 teams " stat/saying.

IMO that is useless stat, winning a super bowl means things have to come together just right for the team ( see 07 Giants for the best recent example ), and it just has not happened twice for the same coach yet, does not mean it cannot or will not happen. Just getting to the super bowl is something most head coaches will not experience once, let alone twice. I don't know it just irks me for some reason ( nothing personal Mr.Scot )

It's primary use in pointing out is that hiring someone who has been there and done that is nowhere near a guarantee of success. Though I have no data to back it up, I also think retreads are often expected to duplicate results in a somewhat unrealistic fashion.

[mav1234]

I do not buy the " no retread has won with 2 teams " stat/saying.

IMO that is useless stat, winning a super bowl means things have to come together just right for the team ( see 07 Giants for the best recent example ), and it just has not happened twice for the same coach yet, does not mean it cannot or will not happen. Just getting to the super bowl is something most head coaches will not experience once, let alone twice. I don't know it just irks me for some reason ( nothing personal Mr.Scot )

It's primary use in pointing out is that hiring someone who has been there and done that is nowhere near a guarantee of success. Though I have no data to back it up, I also think retreads are often expected to duplicate results in a somewhat unrealistic fashion.

[Jangler]

You know Crazy Bale would get it done!

[Jangler]

I know everybody is different, but I think JR got burned with Seifert and will probably not go that way again. I could be wrong. Won't be the first time... Seifert was a product of the organization just like Cowher. I really hope they go with new blood, somebody who is hungry and ready to prove he should have been a coach 2 or 3 years ago. Garrett might be a way to go, but will Dallas really let him go?

Shhhesh you're stupid! shut the fug up and post some pictures!!

[Jackofalltrades]

Shocked not to see Harbaugh on the list.

Leslie Frazier for me, thanks.