Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Short extended, 5 years 80 million


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

Wait, people are complaining about keeping Star, KK, and Butler? I mean, Star won't command that much. 

no one is complaining about it, just pointing out this short deal basically precludes an extension for star.

unless you live in childlike ignorance. In that case you're twisting yourself into knots generating a convoluted reason based on positional ignorance to justify your immature pining. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, panther4life said:

Im super optimistic about 3rd down pass rushing situations. Addison-Short-Butler- Peppers for 17.If we can get a guy like Basham on day 2 and let him develop behind Peppers and Johnson for a year, he could be ready to take over for the long haul. 

Man that has the potential to be special.

Pair that with a full year under the belt for the rookies, along with Captain securing the nickel position....Mike Adams at SS and Coleman back to FS

 

lets goooo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thomas96 said:

Wow that's shocking. Was sure we'd play out this year and see how Butler does. Does this mean Star is gone after next year or what? Or just loaded at DT rotation with Star, KK and Butler? Great value deal though for $16M per year. He could've gotten over $18M per on the open market. 

To me, it will be very interesting to see if a good portion of that is based on incentives.

If its structured as Years 1-2 = Signing Bonus + Salary = $40M and Years 3-5 = Heavily Incentive Based, I can see how that would a good deal for both the player (lots of money up front) and the team (if KK "ages" quickly after he hits 30+ in years 3-5, the team would be protected).

If its all Bonus + Salary (and not incentive based), I still don't have a problem with it because KK is an impact player at an impact position, but I would prefer there be some team "protection" built in for the latter years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...