Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Approve of this mock?


dpm0409

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Not to argue your opinion but did you see the Senior Bowl?  Zay Jones was all over the place.  Caught everything thrown his way and really impressed me.  

As a former ECU student, back in the days of Terry Long, I try to stay away from ECU players just because of my loyalty to the Pirate football team.   But this young man is a baller.   I would love to see him with Cam.

I'm just weary. I remember I used to want Justin Hardy really bad and he went to gbe Falcons. He's not doing much there. I just see Zay as a faster Justin Hardy. I could be wrong. If he's picked though I'll always hope for the best. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to argue your opinion but did you see the Senior Bowl?  Zay Jones was all over the place.  Caught everything thrown his way and really impressed me.  
As a former ECU student, back in the days of Terry Long, I try to stay away from ECU players just because of my loyalty to the Pirate football team.   But this young man is a baller.   I would love to see him with Cam.

Was the best player on the field that game. Can play outside or in the slot, he's not the fastest guy, but his routes are crisp and the guy has maybe the best hands in the draft.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Smithers said:

This.  If the Bears take a QB, it could cause a ripple effect.  The 49ers and Jets could easily then pull the trigger on a QB themselves.  

Don't the Bears have Sanchez? Why in the world would they take a QB in the first when they have a guy who went to 2 or 3 AFC Championships in a row?

 

 

 

 

wait what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Woodie said:

Yep!  I watched his games on draftbreakdown.com, and I think they way underutilized him at ECU.  They wanted him underneath as a safety valve, but I think he could have been a dangerous downfield threat if they used him there more.  But this is why I think he is underrated by many people.  I can't tell you how many balls I saw him catch that were thrown perfectly at his shoes.  His QB was just atrocious. 

Honestly, I think he has the speed, route running, and speed to be an eventual #1.  And he demonstrated time and time again that he's not afraid to go over the middle.  IMO, he's going to be a stud.

Just to be clear, I agree with your post.  Just think "underutilized" is probably the wrong word to use.  Dude has the most receptions in FBS history currently with 399.  Had like 22 or 23 receptions against South Carolina this past year or something absurd like that.  Perhaps utilize him in additional ways, but idk about underutilized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Moorgan said:

Don't the Bears have Sanchez? Why in the world would they take a QB in the first when they have a guy who went to 2 or 3 AFC Championships in a row?

 

 

 

 

wait what?

LOL you had me going for a second.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dpm0409 said:

Just to be clear, I agree with your post.  Just think "underutilized" is probably the wrong word to use.  Dude has the most receptions in FBS history currently with 399.  Had like 22 or 23 receptions against South Carolina this past year or something absurd like that.  Perhaps utilize him in additional ways, but idk about underutilized.

Misused may be a better word.  I think he could have been a monster downfield if they used him there more.  I just don't think they maximized his talents.  IMO, he could have been a big play/TD machine.  He was great at the underneath stuff, but I think he has much more value than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...