Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Start Moore....what do we have to lose?


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

Problem is that Moore is not very good. Talked to Dan Morgan about him last week and he said he is definitely not starter material in the NFL....and it is apparent in the film room, meetings, practice, and in the huddle.

This is also why Moore can never get above 3rd string no matter what happens to the other QB's. We bring guys in and he is still 3rd string. Why? Because he is 3rd string material.

Lol I had a lengthy response to this... but forget it. *Just laughs*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem is that Moore is not very good. Talked to Dan Morgan about him last week and he said he is definitely not starter material in the NFL....and it is apparent in the film room, meetings, practice, and in the huddle.

This is also why Moore can never get above 3rd string no matter what happens to the other QB's. We bring guys in and he is still 3rd string. Why? Because he is 3rd string material.

well, no offense meant toward Dan Morgan....but his opinion is not the end all be all either. He probably would say Vinny or Carr were the better options in 07 but only Moore got the results on the field. I mean, the proof is in the pudding and you can't argue with results on Sunday when he was given a start. Obvously it wasn't all that apparent b/c what occured on Sunday in on 07 didnt' support that. I mean, if you polled Beason, Davis, and Diggs who they thought was the best QB to start next week..........they could all give different answers from each other.......just saying.

I mean, you don't think Morgan could be bias a tad do you? I mean, he did play w/ Jake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there are still 13 games left!

i can count. i know how many games are left. I also know that this team has failed to adjust problems from last year 3 times. we are 3 games behind the saints, and 2 games behind the falcons, who have already beaten us. its good to stay positive, but get real. THis is not a playoff team. they are banged up, slow, and appear to lack motivation. and apparently, if they get a lead, they can't comeback, and if they get behind, they can't catch up. are we even watching the same team? they look dumb out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delhomme will start against the Redskins. His performance against the Cowboys was bad, but it wasn't exceptionally awful (like the Eagles game). As long as he continues to play right around mediocre, he will continue to start. Fox and Hurney are going to be extremely reluctant to bench the QB that they extended in the off season and that they have stood by for so long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's a decent vid with compelling reasons for his opinion. But, my thing is is that you simply can't draft McMillan thinking he is a surefire WR1. There are questions. His 40---rightly or wrongly---will play a part. I'd think that his splits (which will speak more to his game translating to the pros in my mind) are more important.  As much as you're trying to sell us that McMillan is a don't-overthink-it-type-of-player, I wouldn't say that's the case. Workouts will play a part in all of this.  At this point, I like the thought of Tetairoa. That's as much as I can give you right now.
    • If Canales has helped Bryce a “poo ton” and this is what we have then what’s the fuging point? And the offense wasn’t humming with Dalton in there either, except against the raiders who’ll likely be firing their coach after this season.  XL is probably the fourth best looking receiving option on the team right now behind thielen, Coker, and sanders. I don’t think anyone would disagree with that. Who cares about total receiving yards when everyone else has missed time and there’s like 180 yards of receiving a game to go around   and lmao they were “believing” shut the fug up. They lost and for the most part those games were all the defense shutting down the other team. The chiefs turned around and gave up an actual impressive stat line to Aiden O’Connell and I not even the most delusional raiders fans think that means anything. Bryce did nothing against the eagles, the Bucs are a mash unit, and any one of us could have done that Bryce did against the giants and saints.  And as far as who they’d get, they didn’t have any trouble hiring the guy you’re tripping over yourself to defend. They also could have hired Dan Quinn, who’s actually succeeding with a young qb.  And people are acting like the risk of getting paid for not working for five years is a negative. Canales is going to spend the next half a decade getting paid to watch porn in his Bible camp office.
    • the Dallas game definitely quelled the hype. his biggest issue will always be his size, and that shows when he gets sacked. he's simply not big or strong enough to protect the ball. even in the KC game, he fumbled it on a basic sack and thank god icky landed on it. INT's are going to happen, most fans don't understand that tipped balls and wrong routes account for most interceptions. but the wet-bar-of-soap type fumbles upon contact are a huge reg flag. the common theme with players like Darnold and Mayfield who previously played for us and are now excelling makes me want to practice patience more when it comes to the QB position. I think Bryce bought himself another season, perhaps with more weapons. I do like the idea of adding a QB whether that's a FA or mid round rookie. if the same mistakes occur next season and we see no further growth or most importantly, wins, then it will be time to move on. just a quick reminder though, football is not an individual sport. QB is just one position, albeit the most important. 
×
×
  • Create New...