Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some notes from my source

Verge

By Verge,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Verge Veteran

Verge

Posted
  • Author
Posted

"Browns called us, asked about trade up, asked about interest in qb, makes the assumption of Trubisky first overall even more  cloudy, who knows anymore man, this draft is crazy"

Lol, the misdirection has nfl teams stressed out. Think even the smokescreen teams are buying their own smokescreen at this point?


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MrBubba Experienced

MrBubba

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Verge said:

"Browns called us, asked about trade up, asked about interest in qb, makes the assumption of Trubisky first overall even more  cloudy, who knows anymore man, this draft is crazy"

Lol, the misdirection has nfl teams stressed out. Think even the smokescreen teams are buying their own smokescreen at this point?


 

Browns called about trading up from 12 to 8 or Panthers trading up from 8 to 1?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chardee MacDennis Newbie

Chardee MacDennis

Posted
Posted

My guess is your guy works for SF. Just a guess. No idea. Anywho, no need to spill it. But at this point, any info your guy can get is very much appreciated.

I am officially in this current mindframe-- any of the following in Carolina will make me happy: Adams, Fournette, McCaffrey, Allen, Garrett, Howard, Lattimore, Thomas....so yeah. As long as DG doesn't go stoopid at 8 and take some rando, I'll be happy.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Lobo Grand Master

The Lobo

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Chardee MacDennis said:

My guess is your guy works for SF. Just a guess. No idea. Anywho, no need to spill it. But at this point, any info your guy can get is very much appreciated.

I am officially in this current mindframe-- any of the following in Carolina will make me happy: Adams, Fournette, McCaffrey, Allen, Garrett, Howard, Lattimore, Thomas....so yeah. As long as DG doesn't go stoopid at 8 and take some rando, I'll be happy.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

That's how I am. Don't trade up and I will be happy with pretty much anyone at 8

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Gin and Juice said:

Modern NFL moved away from the Power Run game! That's why it's the perfect time to have a dominant Power Run game

Any idiot can invest in Coca Cola stock!  That's easy!

NOW WATCH ME INVEST IN R.C. COLA AND MAKE A KILLING!

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WilliamB24 Newbie

WilliamB24

Posted
Posted
If we do, then everything that Gettleman has spewed about draft "gold" has been a blatant lie.

Its all in what picks you consider "gold" he's simply seeing all the Holes Christian would fill, hence the Lost in free agency Ted Ginn to the saints, a running back since we will be losing Stewart this is his last year as he is 30 years old going into his last year under contract

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bronn Contributor

Bronn

Posted
Posted

No source but just a roiling gut feeling...

Panthers trade back into the late first, or use #40 to take a LB.

I'm not sold that we are sold on our depth. TD is nearing the end of his career, Luke's noggin is a concern for me, and Shaq is still learning. Behind them, we've got solid guys but no capable week-in-week-out starters.

I've been high on Zach Cunningham for a long time, and I think he could be a target, as well as a couple other guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Bronn said:

No source but just a roiling gut feeling...

Panthers trade back into the late first, or use #40 to take a LB.

I'm not sold that we are sold on our depth. TD is nearing the end of his career, Luke's noggin is a concern for me, and Shaq is still learning. Behind them, we've got solid guys but no capable week-in-week-out starters.

I've been high on Zach Cunningham for a long time, and I think he could be a target, as well as a couple other guys.

I don't see us going LB over DB if the grades are anywhere close....if we don't go Adams or Hooker in the 1st....but who the hell knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
therealmjl Grand Master

therealmjl

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Bronn said:

No source but just a roiling gut feeling...

Panthers trade back into the late first, or use #40 to take a LB.

I'm not sold that we are sold on our depth. TD is nearing the end of his career, Luke's noggin is a concern for me, and Shaq is still learning. Behind them, we've got solid guys but no capable week-in-week-out starters.

I've been high on Zach Cunningham for a long time, and I think he could be a target, as well as a couple other guys.

Please God No

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...