Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB


Shocker

Recommended Posts

Cam was terrible last year...like I said, its crossed my mind.  I like Watson a lot.

 

Yeah, I know it won't happen and there isn't a guy here worth it (if you think that) but if Cam repeats what he did last year we might be in the market.

And I am a guy that said he was HOF after the Super Bowl.  Didn't like his play at all last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I was thinking about this the other day.  It wouldn't completely surprise me if we draft a QB in the later rounds to compete for a backup spot.  Anderson, for the first time, looked awful last season as a backup.  He's getting older and we need to start thinking of other options.  

I wouldn't be opposed to Anderson being cut, Webb being promoted to 2nd, and a rookie taking over third string.  

With that being said...probably won't happen.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's crossed my mind also.  But it was just thinking how this board would melt down if it happened.  It would be hilarious!   What if BPA is a QB and Dave pulled the trigger?   Let the conspiracy theories begin.

But seriously, we should be looking for an upgrade to DA at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Cam was terrible last year...like I said, its crossed my mind.  I like Watson a lot.

 

Yeah, I know it won't happen and there isn't a guy here worth it (if you think that) but if Cam repeats what he did last year we might be in the market.

And I am a guy that said he was HOF after the Super Bowl.  Didn't like his play at all last year.

A QB? AT #8? 

LOLOLOLOL!!!!

IF we take a QB, it'll be a late round flier type of pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...