Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: 49ers Interested With Fournette At #2


Saca312

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

They just said that the Notre Dame QB Kizer blew them away.   It would be a major gamble to let him try and make round 2.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000788907/article/john-lynch-deshone-kizer-blew-49ers-away-in-interview

    It's starting. If you don't have a QB, you're not really building your team. If an owner asks you "Are you planning on taking one of these QBs with our pick?", and you say no, what's the plan? Well, we hope to suck enough to get one next year with all the same issues. And if we don't suck bad enough, we will probably have to trade up to get one. Oh, and that puts us another year behind schedule. And you will probably fire me by year 3.

   I think at least two go before our pick. Plus, I think SF is trying hard for Cousins. If that happens, it puts WASH in that spot needing a QB badly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ncfan said:

He's like the 5th guy they've came out and said they like at #2.  They need a QB badly.  They need help on the D.

Hyde is one of the top players they have (when healthy). So don't see them going RB round 1

The 9ers are not going to get better in a year. If they pick RB or QB they will still be picking top 10 next year and Fournette is better than any QB prospect IMO. SF also could trade for Romo and use him as a manager with Fournette and Hyde.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt they do it but honestly I don't care if they do. If he isn't there at 8 someone else we need elsewhere will be. We will get a stud player in any event. Honestly I think Fournette is getting overhyped given he has an injury issue. He might be another Stewart honestly.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=/amp/s/www.seccountry.com/lsu/source-lsu-rb-leonard-fournettes-ankle-injury-a-chronic-problem/amp&ved=0ahUKEwjrz-KGsrrSAhVHQiYKHQn3C50QFggzMAM&usg=AFQjCNHWm7SNgSvC8Ba928nt_IjybZGHfg&sig2=xjDIyJrGmHJUYrLptP3QEg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

I doubt they do it but honestly I don't care if they do. If he isn't there at 8 someone else we need elsewhere will be. We will get a stud player in any event. Honestly I think Fournette is getting overhyped given he has an injury issue. He might be another Stewart honestly.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=/amp/s/www.seccountry.com/lsu/source-lsu-rb-leonard-fournettes-ankle-injury-a-chronic-problem/amp&ved=0ahUKEwjrz-KGsrrSAhVHQiYKHQn3C50QFggzMAM&usg=AFQjCNHWm7SNgSvC8Ba928nt_IjybZGHfg&sig2=xjDIyJrGmHJUYrLptP3QEg

When you have to break down scenarios where he falls two things will happen. Either we pass on him or he will no be there because he was that good. I'm hope we can snag McCaffrey in the 2nd by some chance. He would be awesome for what you need in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who cares?  If they take Fournete and Browns take a QB, this would be awesome for us.

Myles Garrett, Jamal Adams, Malik Hooker, Solomon Thomas, Jonathan Allen

It would guarantee we will have a chance to get one of those players at #8 (assuming someone takes Lattimore or someone else not currently being mocked to go in the top 10, which always happens).  Would losing Fournette suck?  I guess... depending on how much you like the guy.  But I'd be happy as hell to snatch up a top pass rusher or safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

The majority of the defense up and retired after Harbaugh left.   SF knows they have to have a defense.   I think they'll go QB or Defense. 

QB is a super dicy game this year. If you are a QB guru head coach and are trying not to get fired after a year, a RB that can manage a game might be a better pick. There are more Blane Gabberts this year than anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Snake said:

QB is a super dicy game this year. If you are a QB guru head coach and are trying not to get fired after a year, a RB that can manage a game might be a better pick. There are more Blane Gabberts this year than anything else.

Well Shanahan is supposed to be that QB guru.   The Carolina QB would be a god pick.   I could also see Washington doing a sign and trade deal with Cousins.

I think this is nothing more than smoke and mirrors.

Let's not forget Lynch is a HOF safety.  Adams could be too much for him to Overlook.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Snake said:

QB is a super dicy game this year. If you are a QB guru head coach and are trying not to get fired after a year, a RB that can manage a game might be a better pick. There are more Blane Gabberts this year than anything else.

They already have a good RB, they need other skill players like TE/ WR/ or go defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, cam1uvrxoxo said:

This report makes it clear

 

We need to trade up for the #2 pick. We NEED Fournette for a Super Bowl, no other way to slice it

And this is exactly what the 49ers are hoping to rope another GM into thinking. 

Game. Blouses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't know about you but I have been a life long Chiefs fan for the past 4 years.
    • Sure there's a ton of transplants in Colorado now. But as far as Denver in particular goes the Broncos have also been around for 65 years. Someone moving to Denver is going to be far more likely to become a fan of the Broncos and even attend games versus someone moving to Charlotte and the Panthers. Like I said it's not just one single thing with us it's multiple factors.
    • He's definitely getting better. It's fun to watch.  I've been getting killed for this take, but with the current state of college football, it just takes more time to develop a quarterback. I don't think it's a plug and play position anymore. I'm really not sure if it ever was. NFL offenses have always been substantially more complex than the college game, and the college game has simplified even more in recent years. Many college teams do not have a physical playbook anymore. That's just not the national football league.  Are there freaks who have success from day 1? Yes, without question. But so many of those guys are runners, and so many of those guys tail off. Is Bryce ever going to be Josh Allen? Probably not.  What I am seeing is a guy with complete command of the offense. He's checking into things at the line, making adjustments, and making timely throws.  He goes to David Moore a ton, because Moore is a consistent route runner. Bryce knows where he is and when he should be open. I think the guy with the "super processor" needs to be comfortable in the offense in order to do the "super processing." He doesn't have elite arm talent, and he is small of stature, but if he makes the smart play consistently, and he's willing to throw the ball downfield and not make mistakes, like he's starting to show, he's going to be a starter for a long time in this league, and it's not a position I'd spend draft capital right now. 
×
×
  • Create New...